03-18-2019, 12:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-18-2019, 12:22 PM by Bill the Piper.)
(03-18-2019, 11:27 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: Non-Abrahamic traditionalists (Hindus, Buddhists, Taoists, and Shinto followers) would seem fully conformist within their cultures, and even conservative.
Still Shinto, Taoism and some ethnic religions contain a kind of reverence for nature and non-patriarchal attitude to sex and gender, which hippies admired.
Quote:Neopagans, anyone?
Avatar-style feminist-environmentalist society seems to be a neopagan ideal. I'm sure there were plenty of neopagans in the Transcendental generation, Evelyn de Morgan (Progressive) was one too, such it's not a boomer invention. How much does this have in common with actual Indo-European religion? Zeus and Indra were big muscular guys who liked to rape nymphs. Odin? I don't know. Abraham never raped anyone, so he was more feminist despite being often considered a symbol of patriarchy. Jesus never did anything which could be interpreted as sexist. The whole counterculture thing seems to owe more to Christianity than it wants to admit.
Quote:There's always room for more and new interpretations.
Always. But they will always be variants of one of three fundamental systems. Now I have 7 sub-sectors and the centre which is still white.
Quote:Like Mussolini, Quisling, and Laval, Satan Hussein moved from being a socialist to being a fascist. Franco is clearly a clerico-fascist.
Fascism, which means paramilitary organisation of everything, is a tool, which could be utilized by clerical traditionalists (Franco), identitarian traditionalists (Hitler) and even some socialists (Satan Hussein).
As for core principles: Liberty for Individualists, Equality for Leftists, Righteousness for traditionalists. You can have environmentalist-feminist code of righteousness too.