05-14-2020, 03:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-14-2020, 04:40 AM by Blazkovitz.)
How does anarchy fit in the diagram?
Quite nicely, actually. There are no anarcho-securitarians or anarcho-nationalists because securitarianism and nationalism are statist ideologies by definition.
Other sectors have their anarchist counterparts:
-anarcho-capitalists, like Murray Rothbard
-anarcho-communists, working class anarchists like Mikhail Bakunin
-anarcho-inclusivists, like the hippies
-anarcho-theocrats like the Amish. Israel under the Judges was a good example of an anarcho-theocratic society. The poet William Blake would fit in this sector as well.
That's why anarcho-capitalism would lead to feudalism in practice. And other types of anarchy would lead to plain chaos. Anarcho-theocracy might be most practicable, but only when everybody is pious and agrees on the same faith.
Quite nicely, actually. There are no anarcho-securitarians or anarcho-nationalists because securitarianism and nationalism are statist ideologies by definition.
Other sectors have their anarchist counterparts:
-anarcho-capitalists, like Murray Rothbard
-anarcho-communists, working class anarchists like Mikhail Bakunin
-anarcho-inclusivists, like the hippies
-anarcho-theocrats like the Amish. Israel under the Judges was a good example of an anarcho-theocratic society. The poet William Blake would fit in this sector as well.
(05-11-2020, 04:20 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: The Right offered tax revolts as the model of freedom -- except that now we are the subjects of the narrow interests that profited most.
That's why anarcho-capitalism would lead to feudalism in practice. And other types of anarchy would lead to plain chaos. Anarcho-theocracy might be most practicable, but only when everybody is pious and agrees on the same faith.