12-08-2016, 09:14 AM
(12-05-2016, 11:26 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:(12-05-2016, 12:35 PM)gabrielle Wrote: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/...refreshing
So how come claims about millions of illegal voters without proof are "bogus" but conspiracy theories about voting machine manipulation without proof are perfectly all right?
Oh, right, because MSNBC is populated by partisan hacks like Maddow.
It seems reasonable to me to hold the president, or president-elect, to a high standard.
"But there's a difference between error and dishonesty, and it's not a trivial difference." - Ben Greenman
"Relax, it'll be all right, and by that I mean it will first get worse."
"How was I supposed to know that there'd be consequences for my actions?" - Gina Linetti
"Relax, it'll be all right, and by that I mean it will first get worse."
"How was I supposed to know that there'd be consequences for my actions?" - Gina Linetti