11-13-2016, 01:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-13-2016, 01:44 AM by Eric the Green.)
He claims 100% success rate, that's the point. I never hear him mention his failure in 2000, except very briefly and no-one calls him on it. If you listen carefully though, he claims that he predicted "the popular vote" in every election. By that measure, he missed the electoral vote in 2000 and the popular vote itself in 2016.
It makes it easy in our age when the difference occurs more often, to claim victory if either the electoral or the popular vote predicted correctly means you are going to be right either way.
The new moon method I invented predicts the popular vote, and I have used it since 2004 without fail. 100%. The record of my methods is shown in my article, which I'm sure you didn't read. It shows how often my methods have worked going back into the 18th and 19th centuries.
It makes it easy in our age when the difference occurs more often, to claim victory if either the electoral or the popular vote predicted correctly means you are going to be right either way.
The new moon method I invented predicts the popular vote, and I have used it since 2004 without fail. 100%. The record of my methods is shown in my article, which I'm sure you didn't read. It shows how often my methods have worked going back into the 18th and 19th centuries.