Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
(12-31-2016, 09:56 AM)John J. Xenakis Wrote: > Lol! So it's all my imagination, huh? I dreamed up the "China
> dream" myself? Maybe I hallucinated those illegal military bases
> on artificial islands in the SCS as well.

> I've been discussing the Taiwan issue with people for 15 years,
> and there are a lot of people in Congress and the military that
> are very protective of Taiwan. So I'm telling you that if China
> invades Taiwan, then we'll be at war within 6 hours. Beijing
> knows this. If they didn't know it, then they would already have
> sent troops into Taiwan, as they did in Tiananmen Square, as they
> have into Tibet and Xinjiang, and are threatening to do in Hong
> Kong, and as they do anywhere on the mainland at the slightest
> hint of dissent. Therefore, any threat of war against Taiwan is
> inevitably a threat of war against the United States. Chinese,
> Taiwanese and American officials are all aware of this, even if
> you claim not to be.

(12-31-2016, 12:05 PM)Warren Dew Wrote: > Ah, so you base your idea about China wanting to become "the
> principal superpower in the world" on what a bunch of westerners
> in DC say?

> I can well believe, due to that rising xenophobia and racism you
> talk about, that westerners in DC might have some delusional
> paranoia along the lines you outline. That doesn't mean that
> China is likely to start a war with the US, though; it means any
> war between the two is more likely to be started by the US.

> Of course, that may not make a lot of difference. If such a war
> went nuclear, the US would lose a bunch of cities and China would
> lose everything - which is perhaps another reason the US is more
> likely to start such a war. It's far from clear that Russia would
> come in on the US side, though; more likely they would sit it out
> until it was already decided. I suppose they might then decide to
> take over China, so that they can actually become the world's
> predominant superpower.


You say, "If such a war went nuclear, the US would lose a bunch of
cities and China would lose everything."

Actually, that's not the Chinese view. The Chinese position was
stated by a PLA top-level officer that I quoted in 2005:

General Zhu Chenghu Wrote:> If the Americans are determined to interfere [in Taiwan, then] we
> will be determined to respond. We ... will prepare ourselves for
> the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian [in central
> China]. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that
> hundreds ... of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese.

** China and Japan head for military confrontation over disputed islands.
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/x...tm#e050716


However, war with China can start with many scenarios besides a
standoff over Taiwan. It might begin in the Mideast, Europe, the
South China Sea, in Kashmir, and so forth, and then spread to
full-scale world war.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by John J. Xenakis - 12-31-2016, 11:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 5,165 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,575 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 5,075 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,947 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,456 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)