It's in the "stars" (predicting by astrology and other means)

[Marypoza]

(02-02-2017, 03:54 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(02-02-2017, 03:41 PM)Marypoza Wrote:

(02-02-2017, 03:30 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(02-02-2017, 03:05 PM)Marypoza Wrote: Astrologers don't always agree. If you think Ceres is as important as Pluto; go for it. I would not go that route myself. But I do include Ceres in charts, as you can see.

-- well it's orbit is shorter than Pluto's, so it's influence is more personal in nature, whereas Pluto's influence is generational, & while it can be influential in personal horoscopes is more influential in mundane horoscopes

And in the case of candidates for president, their charts must be considered "mundane" in this respect, because we're talking about who can get elected president. And the actual president's chart becomes mundane because what he does and what happens to him affects the nation. The president (and his/her "personal" traits) personifies the nation while (s)he's in power.

--dunno if the Donald wants 2b considered mundane, but yeah l'll go with that as a matter of principle