05-09-2017, 06:35 AM
(05-09-2017, 03:57 AM)Galen Wrote:(05-08-2017, 06:47 AM)Odin Wrote:(05-06-2017, 11:50 PM)Galen Wrote:(05-06-2017, 08:55 AM)Odin Wrote: Somebody who follows 17th century ideology attacking someone for 17th century science?
Libertarian thought does start with John Locke in the seventeenth century but it has evolved and still is evolving. Only you would have problems with people who base their political philosophy on the non-aggression principle. Still given how the peaceful the left have shown themselves to be this is to be expected.
The Non-Aggression Principle can simply be dismissed as naive nonsense, it's basically throwing up ones hands and going "why can't we all be nice to each other and sing kumbaya and everyone will be happy???", it's the domestic equivalent of naive pacifists carrying cute signs like "what if they ordered a war and nobody came?".
The non-aggression principle does allow for self-defense since it is the initiation of force that is disallowed. As usual you have failed to do even the most basic research.
Once again you missed the point since you think I was only talking about self-defense, I wasn't. There are a lot of situations where the initiation of force is necessary to stop a greater evil. Then again, IIRC you are one of those deranged Isolationists who think the US should have stayed out of WW2 and that Pearl Harbor was all FDR's fault, so I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

#MakeTheDemocratsGreatAgain