07-16-2017, 11:05 PM
“To understand the scale of the hacking attempts against election systems in the 2016 presidential election, consider South Carolina,” the Wall Street Journal reports.
“On Election Day alone, there were nearly 150,000 attempts to penetrate the state’s voter-registration system, according to a post-election report by the South Carolina State Election Commission.”
“And South Carolina wasn’t even a competitive state. If hackers were that persistent against a state that President Donald Trump won comfortably, with 54.9% of the vote, it suggests they may have targeted political swing states even more.”
https://politicalwire.com/2017/07/16/sou...n-hacking/
We may have not had a free and fair election for president, Senate seats, and the House in 2016.
“On Election Day alone, there were nearly 150,000 attempts to penetrate the state’s voter-registration system, according to a post-election report by the South Carolina State Election Commission.”
“And South Carolina wasn’t even a competitive state. If hackers were that persistent against a state that President Donald Trump won comfortably, with 54.9% of the vote, it suggests they may have targeted political swing states even more.”
https://politicalwire.com/2017/07/16/sou...n-hacking/
We may have not had a free and fair election for president, Senate seats, and the House in 2016.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.