08-21-2018, 12:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-21-2018, 12:19 AM by Eric the Green.)
There's only one time when the new moon before election (which applies since 1848), and the horoscope score comparison, were both wrong: 1892, when Cleveland beat Harrison. And that was the exact year of a once-in-493-year conjunction between Neptune and Pluto, which has a millennias-long history of knocking off rulers and empires when it comes around.
So it's very unlikely that both indicators would be wrong. The new moon predicts that the incumbent party will win, even despite some contrary indicators. So I predict Trump will win unless the Democrats nominate someone with a higher score than Trump. Usually the new moon indicator is only wrong, which it rarely is, if the difference between candidate scores is quite substantial, and contrary to the new moon indicator. Note that the currently-favored contenders don't meet this standard, until you get down to #8 on the list, Terry McAuliffe. If there is a Joe Montana lurking among them, it is probably Mitch Landrieu.
http://philosopherswheel.com/presidentialelections.html
So it's very unlikely that both indicators would be wrong. The new moon predicts that the incumbent party will win, even despite some contrary indicators. So I predict Trump will win unless the Democrats nominate someone with a higher score than Trump. Usually the new moon indicator is only wrong, which it rarely is, if the difference between candidate scores is quite substantial, and contrary to the new moon indicator. Note that the currently-favored contenders don't meet this standard, until you get down to #8 on the list, Terry McAuliffe. If there is a Joe Montana lurking among them, it is probably Mitch Landrieu.
http://philosopherswheel.com/presidentialelections.html