07-14-2016, 11:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-14-2016, 11:36 AM by David Horn.
Edit Reason: Messy
)
(07-06-2016, 01:12 PM)radind Wrote: Which is more secure is not relevant to current US policies on the handling of classified information. My concern is that Clinton was not treated as anyone else in the government would have been treated. Looks like special treatment to me.
There may be other cases, but I have never heard of any involving Top Secret/Special Access Program information where no action was taken.
I agree. Hillary has monumental bad judgement when it impacts her privacy, and this fell far enough from the tree to be actionable. On the other hand, we don't actually know what was compromised, so it may be trivial. When I held the clearance to see the stuff, we had plenty of TS/SCI material that was classified for no apparent reason ... or more often, to prevent embarrassment. For reference, I saw most of the traffic from the Pueblo incident. If it touched that topic it got the full treatment.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.