09-14-2020, 01:01 PM
At this point I can defer to the expert, Nate Silver, from whom I adapted my model. He has more data from which to derive his model, and has the means of compiling a composite of polling data that I cannot do because of a lack of computing power and software for such.
Here is my model:
My estimates for the results for intermediate probabilities based on near-linear differentials for three and two months out for a Senate campaign, which I see as a good analogue for a statewide campaign for a State's electoral votes:.
Time to election |1 point|5 points||10 points|20 points|
one day............. |...64%|....95%|.....99.7%|.99.999%|
one week........... |...60%|....89%|.......98%|...99.97%|
one month......... |...57%|....81%|.......95%|.....99.7%|
three months......|...55%|....72%|........87%|......98%|
six months..........|...53%|....66%|.......79%|.......93%|
one year.............|....52%|...59%|.......67%|.......81%|
lead likelihood, three months and two months
0 50 50 10 87 91
1 55 56 11 88 92
2 59 64 12 89 93
3 64 69 13 90 94
4 69 73 14 91 95
5 72 77 15 92 96
6 76 78 16 93 97
7 80 80 17 94 97
8 83 84 18 95 97
9 85 87 19 96 97
Note that the probability that a leader wins more precipitously at 5% (9% delta) than at 1 (2% delta), so the increase from my estimate at three months cannot be linear in the range between a 1% and a 5% lead.
.
![[Image: genusmap.php?year=1964&ev_c=1&pv_p=1&ev_...&NE3=1;0;9]](https://uselectionatlas.org/TOOLS/genusmap.php?year=1964&ev_c=1&pv_p=1&ev_p=1&type=calc&AL=2;2;8&AK=2;20;6&AZ=1;67;4&AR=2;7;6&CA=1;99+;8&CO=1;86;5&CT=1;99;8&DE=1;99+;8&DC=1;99+;8&FL=1;61;4&GA=2;34;4&HI=1;99;8&ID=2;0;8&IL=1;99+;8&IN=2;5;8&IA=2;33;4&KS=2;7;6&KY=2;2;8&LA=2;8;6&MD=1;99+;8&MA=1;99+;8&MI=1;86;6&MN=1;83;5&MS=2;13;6&MO=2;10;6&MT=2;13;6&NV=1;80;5&NH=1;73;5&NJ=1;97;8&NM=1;94;8&NY=1;99+;8&NC=1;54;2&ND=2;1;8&OH=2;45;2&OK=2;0;8&OR=1;92;6&PA=1;75;5&RI=1;99+;8&SC=2;13;6&SD=2;3;8&TN=2;5;8&TX=2;32;4&UT=2;5;8&VT=1;99+;8&VA=1;95;8&WA=1;99+;8&WV=2;0;8&WI=1;75;5&WY=2;0;8&ME=1;83;6&ME1=1;96;8&ME2=2;42;2&NE=2;1;8&NE1=2;7;6&NE2=1;62;4&NE3=1;0;9)
Numbers likely to be ill-seen:
CT 99
DE 99+
DC (don't be stupid)
MD 99+
ME-AL 83
ME-01 96
ME-02 42
NE-AL 1
NE-01 7
NE-02 62
NE-03 0
NH 73
RI 98
Biden 0-4% saturation 8
Biden 5-20% saturation 6
Biden 21-35% saturation 5
Biden 36-40% saturation 4
Biden 41-49% saturation 2
50/50 white
Biden 51-60% saturation 2
Biden 61-70% saturation 4
Biden 71-80% saturation 5
Biden 81-95% saturation 6
Biden 95%+ saturation 8
I intend to close this thread on September 21, when reality will be closer to one month before the election (in which things really get tougher for someone behind).
Here is my model:
My estimates for the results for intermediate probabilities based on near-linear differentials for three and two months out for a Senate campaign, which I see as a good analogue for a statewide campaign for a State's electoral votes:.
Time to election |1 point|5 points||10 points|20 points|
one day............. |...64%|....95%|.....99.7%|.99.999%|
one week........... |...60%|....89%|.......98%|...99.97%|
one month......... |...57%|....81%|.......95%|.....99.7%|
three months......|...55%|....72%|........87%|......98%|
six months..........|...53%|....66%|.......79%|.......93%|
one year.............|....52%|...59%|.......67%|.......81%|
lead likelihood, three months and two months
0 50 50 10 87 91
1 55 56 11 88 92
2 59 64 12 89 93
3 64 69 13 90 94
4 69 73 14 91 95
5 72 77 15 92 96
6 76 78 16 93 97
7 80 80 17 94 97
8 83 84 18 95 97
9 85 87 19 96 97
Note that the probability that a leader wins more precipitously at 5% (9% delta) than at 1 (2% delta), so the increase from my estimate at three months cannot be linear in the range between a 1% and a 5% lead.
.
Numbers likely to be ill-seen:
CT 99
DE 99+
DC (don't be stupid)
MD 99+
ME-AL 83
ME-01 96
ME-02 42
NE-AL 1
NE-01 7
NE-02 62
NE-03 0
NH 73
RI 98
Biden 0-4% saturation 8
Biden 5-20% saturation 6
Biden 21-35% saturation 5
Biden 36-40% saturation 4
Biden 41-49% saturation 2
50/50 white
Biden 51-60% saturation 2
Biden 61-70% saturation 4
Biden 71-80% saturation 5
Biden 81-95% saturation 6
Biden 95%+ saturation 8
I intend to close this thread on September 21, when reality will be closer to one month before the election (in which things really get tougher for someone behind).
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.