09-26-2020, 10:32 AM
(09-26-2020, 04:28 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote:(09-26-2020, 12:25 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: One of the rules of Olympic competitions is that if one cheats and gets an apparent win, then one loses. So it is with performance-enhancing substances banned by the IOC. Finishing first at a race or lasting longest in a weight-lifting contest leads to a loss of any medal and the potential for banning from competition for a very long time. Basically, if you cheat you lose.
A precedent for denying the Presidency to a cheater does not exist in American history. It exists in a country whose original founders established a political structure for whom the model was the United States of America. The Presidential election of 1986 in the Philippines devolved upon the military deciding that electoral misconduct that the incumbent President had directed effectively disqualified then-President Ferdinand Marcos in favor of Corazon Aquino.
Nitpick. Essentially true, but there is a long tradition that those impeached can no longer serve in the government.
Impeached and convicted, they can't by Article I, Section 3, paragraph 7 of the US Constitution. Nothing prevents those found not-guilty from doing as they please -- and therein lies the rub.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.