06-16-2021, 06:52 PM
(06-16-2021, 12:44 PM)Captain Genet Wrote:(06-16-2021, 08:53 AM)Ghost Wrote: You can't really take 1982-85 out of Millennials. 1982 babies are literally who the term was coined for in the first place, and people born in 1983-85 came of age even later.
The names of the generations are flawed. The year 2000, the Gregorian millennium was not that significant after all. I'd prefer to call the Civics something like Onliners.
Quote:2010 is simply too late for Millennials to end. They were born after the 2008 Financial Crisis, and there's a high likelihood they will come of age during 1T. There are a lot of people who are trying to boot me out of Millennials because I didn't vote in the Trump vs. Hillary election and was only two when 9/11 happened (I generally see this behavior coming from questionable 97-98 babies), and I believe there is even someone on here (might no longer be active) who doesn't include 1999 in Millennials.
That was a conditional sentence: IF 4T lasts till 2030 THEN people born in 2010 could be civics.
I prefer the idea that generations start a few years before a turning. So, a few years before 2008 is the start of the Gen Z adaptives, and the end of millennial civics.