National Review has an article on this. It is really quite rosy and they are diehard nevertrumpers so I don't think they are trying to make him sound good. I think they paint a too rosy picture, Trump will be worse (from my perspective) than they suggest, but maybe he won't be totally awful, maybe only a bit worse than Bush and we survived him.
The street.com gave a more favorable review that suggested he could be pretty good for the economy, unless he is very bad. Not too useful so I don't link it.
The brits had an article, mostly peripheral issues from my perspective on which I don't have much of an opinion.
And then there is the usually doom and gloom stuff. Nowhere have I read anything coherent from a pro-trump pundit, which leads me to suspect that he has no supporters who can make a coherent argument for Trump. I already know that Trump himself cannot.
The street.com gave a more favorable review that suggested he could be pretty good for the economy, unless he is very bad. Not too useful so I don't link it.
The brits had an article, mostly peripheral issues from my perspective on which I don't have much of an opinion.
And then there is the usually doom and gloom stuff. Nowhere have I read anything coherent from a pro-trump pundit, which leads me to suspect that he has no supporters who can make a coherent argument for Trump. I already know that Trump himself cannot.