08-26-2017, 10:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-26-2017, 10:27 AM by Cynic Hero '86.)
Xenakis, Any External Crisis war (at least under boomer leadership) would not be a uniting crisis like WW2 was for the US. Instead an large-scale war under boomer leadership would be similar to how WW1 was handled by Russia. The Only exception is if the war unexpectedly turns out to be a relative walkover for the US where we win almost every battle. In all other scenarios the boomer leaders would eventually be hunted down and killed and replaced be Xers and Millies by force. Xers and Millies hated serving under inept boomer leadership during afghanistan and Iraq. They are NOT going to give boomers another chance after the boomers display of gross incompetence in Iraq. Trump may be an exception as commander in chief because Trump is well known to have opposed the handling of the Iraq war.
Also the boomer mainstreams delusional lies that a north Korean nuclear arsenal was inevitable and that "strategic Patience" was the best option available can be laid bare simply by watching clips of political/strategic analysis by pundits as far back as the 1990s. Here is Trump talking about what should be done about North Korea all the way in 1998 or 1999. The Boomer establishment chose to sit on their ass because they characteristically want someone else to do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-1WE-ivtO4
Please reply to both paragraphs.
Also the boomer mainstreams delusional lies that a north Korean nuclear arsenal was inevitable and that "strategic Patience" was the best option available can be laid bare simply by watching clips of political/strategic analysis by pundits as far back as the 1990s. Here is Trump talking about what should be done about North Korea all the way in 1998 or 1999. The Boomer establishment chose to sit on their ass because they characteristically want someone else to do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-1WE-ivtO4
Please reply to both paragraphs.
