Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 10-Sep-17 World View -- China demands that Indonesia end plans to rename its own territorial waters

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • China demands that Indonesia end plans to rename its own territorial waters
  • Indonesia blocks China's repeated attempts to annex Indonesia's Natuna Islands

****
**** China demands that Indonesia end plans to rename its own territorial waters
****


[Image: g141020b.jpg]
Senoa Island, in Indonesia's Natuna island chain

China is demanding that Indonesia rescind its decision to rename its
own territorial waters in its own exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

In July, Indonesia announced that it's renaming
the portion of the South China Sea belonging to
Indonesia's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) as the "North Natuna Sea."
Indonesia is making the name change official by registering the name
name through the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) and the
United Nations.

This has freaked the Chinese out to the point of throwing a temper
tantrum:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"The China-Indonesian relationship is developing in a
> healthy and stable way, and the South China Sea dispute is
> progressing well. Indonesia’s unilateral name-changing actions
> are not conducive to maintaining this excellent situation.
>
> [Changing] an internationally-accepted name had resulted in the
> complication and expansion of the dispute [and undermines] the
> peace and stability of the region."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

As usual with China, this is total farce. China is undermining peace
and stability in the region by building artificial islands and turning
them into huge military bases, bristling with missiles, radar and
aircraft, in clear violation of international law, as determined by a
2016 ruling by the United Nations Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)
in the Hague, which declared China's activities in the South China Sea
to be illegal.

According to one international relations analyst:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"In fact, the territorial waters of China is only to
> the boundaries of its territorial sea recognized by international
> law. On the other hand, Indonesia also has its own territorial sea
> territory, and therefore has the right to give a name to the
> territorial sea of Indonesia."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

China's military belligerence has caused India, Vietnam and Japan to
form an alliance opposing China in the South China Sea. Because of
China's illegal activities, tensions have escalated substantially in
the South China Sea, threatening the "peace and stability" of the
region. But that's because of China's belligerent military actions,
not because Indonesia is renaming its own territorial waters.
Channel News Asia (2-Sep) and The Diplomat and Asia Times and Netral News (Indonesia)

****
**** Indonesia blocks China's repeated attempts to annex Indonesia's Natuna Islands
****


The region that Indonesia is renaming is in its territorial waters
around the Natuna Islands, a region rich in fish and oil fields. The
region is also strategically important, being located at the southern
tip of the Malacca Strait that connects the South China Sea to the
Indian Ocean.

Indonesia is very, very far from China. There is no possibility
whatsoever that the region in question every belonged to China. But,
just like Adolf Hitler in 1939, China's president Xi Jinping sees
something that he wants that belongs to someone else, and plans to use
China's vast, powerful military to steal it.

There have already been several incidents, with Chinese fishing
vessels illegally fishing in Indonesia's territorial waters.

In March of last year, an Indonesian patrol vessel had captured a
Chinese fishing boat and was towing back to a port where it could be
destroyed, after the 8-member crew had been arrested and were being
held in custody. The patrol vessel was deep into Indonesia's
exclusive economic zone (EEZ), when two large Chinese warships showed
and forced the Indonesians to release the fishing boat.

This incident caused a great deal of outrage among Indonesians,
including calls for a more confrontational relationship with China.
However, Indonesia's president Joko "Jokowi" Widodo has chosen to
continue a steady course, trying to maintain good relations with both
China and the United States. To this end, Indonesia has maintained
what one analyst calls a "delicate equilibrium" with respect to the
South China Sea issue, engaging China diplomatically, while also
pursuing a range of security, legal and economic measures designed to
protect its own interests.

It's undoubtedly Joko's diplomatic engagement that caused China, in
its recent threatening note, to say that the "China-Indonesian
relationship is developing in a healthy and stable way." China
considers a relationship healthy and stable only if the other party is
doing what China is demanding.

Unfortunately, however, China continues to pull stunts like the most
recent one, demanding that Indonesia rescind its decision to rename
its own territorial waters, with the usual implied threat that
Indonesia had better comply, or there will be eventually military
retribution. The Diplomat (24-Mar-2016)

Related Articles

KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Indonesia, Joko 'Jokowi' Widodo,
China, Xi Jinping, South China Sea, India, Vietnam, Japan,
United Nations Permanent Court of Arbitration, PCA,
Natuna Islands, Malacca Strait, North Natuna Sea

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
10-Sep-17 World View -- China demands that Indonesia end plans to rename its own terr - by John J. Xenakis - 09-09-2017, 10:46 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,831 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,410 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,697 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,297 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,342 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)