12-13-2017, 09:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-13-2017, 10:02 AM by Cynic Hero '86.)
Selfish Boomers refuse to allow a strike on North Korea. The problem here is that the selfish boomers are emotionally attached to the idea of america as the world's policeman. This attachment causes boomers to reject any option that contradicts that role. The US has the military assets to carry out a preemptive strike on North Korea, the boomers just refuse to do so for ideological reasons.
An example of Boomers rejecting perfectly good options for purely ideological reasons:
So we're supposed to absorb a North Korean attack just so the boomers can preserve their nonsensical ideals. And boomer wonder why Xers and Millies hate them so much?
An example of Boomers rejecting perfectly good options for purely ideological reasons:
A Boomer on JohnXs Forum Wrote:The choices that we do get to make end up shaping the world we live in.
Ultimately it is that simple: nuke them and be ruled by your environment
or hold back, risk peril, but preserve our ideals and our nation.
We can likely rebuild from the fall out from a nuke. Allies would come to
our side and probably even nuke them for us if we are completely disabled.
I think we have the strength to overcome the challenge similar to the Japanese,
but I don't think America can survive knowing it is the monster.
America while strong and coming from diverse backgrounds is ultimately sewed together by
the delicate thread of our ideals. I think America
will crumble if we drop the bomb. Our ideals
immediately go out the window the second the bomb drops.
So we're supposed to absorb a North Korean attack just so the boomers can preserve their nonsensical ideals. And boomer wonder why Xers and Millies hate them so much?
