02-27-2018, 01:31 PM
(02-27-2018, 10:35 AM)Cynic Hero 86 Wrote: > A Strike must go "all In" not striking North Korea or doing a
> half-measure limited strike is sheer folly. The Boomer refuses to
> comprehend the causes of the various issues both regarding the
> Korea issue or the world in general because doing so would force
> the boomer to admit that their preferences are the problem that
> the entire "peace dividend" since the late 1980s just led to the
> US being regarded as a wuss. The Boomer is emotionally attached to
> globalism and the peace dividend because those are the policies
> THEY advocated. Yet the same boomers refuse to let Xers and
> Millies into the government because they think the Xer or Millies
> MIGHT commit genocide in the future. Thats what makes boomer
> governance tyranny because boomers insist on trying to control the
> natural flows of events and social evolution and that is contrary
> to nature.
When I described the first strike option above, I wrote, "let's assume
that it's done so cleverly that it doesn't lead to an immediate war
with China or to massive retaliation on Seoul."
What you want is both immediate war with China and also massive
retaliation on Seoul. That's why I'm always writing about the
destructiveness and self-destructiveness of Generation-X. You would
welcome a world war that kills four billion people, just as people in
your generation welcomed the financial crisis they created by
knowingly selling fraudulent subprime mortgage backed security.
Your bizarre, vitriolic hatred of Boomers has made you completely
nihilistic, willing to destroy the whole world if it means getting
your revenge against Boomers. The world is in very bad shape today,
but you would bring it to total destruction, which excites you. This
makes you a very dangerous person, and puts people around you in
physical danger.
