Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 6-Oct-18 World View -- China's spy chip attacks shock the computer industry

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • China's spy chip attacks shock the computer industry
  • Industry reactions to China's spy chips
  • Google is repeating the mistakes that IBM made in helping the Nazis

****
**** China's spy chip attacks shock the computer industry
****


[Image: g181005b.jpg]
How China's attack worked (Bloomberg)

The announcement this week by Bloomberg News that an investigation has
found that China is installing backdoor chips on server motherboards
is making the public aware of a major security issue that will affect
a wide variety of electronic products, from iPhones to televisions to
automobile components.

The attack worked as follows:
  • Chinese factories manufactured motherboards to be used in
    computer servers. If you open a desktop computer, you can see the
    motherboard inside -- a large board covered with chips for the CPU
    (microprocessor), computer memory, display processing, graphics
    processing, disk interface, USB interface, network interface, and so
    forth.

  • The Chinese factories added one more chip to the motherboard: a
    tiny chip designed by China's military, with its own private memory,
    processing power, and networking. The chip was so tiny that you
    probably wouldn't notice it unless you were looking for it.

  • A San Jose based American company called Super Micro Computer Inc.
    purchased these Chinese motherboards in quantity, and installed them
    into servers.

  • Supermicro sold the infected servers to dozens of customers, who
    are using them in their data centers. There are at least 30
    companies, including Apple, Amazon, Facebook, a major bank, and
    government contractors.

  • Once the server's power is turned on, the Chinese military chip is
    activated, and communicates with China's military, ready to receive
    commands to take control of the server, or to steal data from
    networked databases.

Apple and Amazon initially denied they were victims of this attack,
but apparently later confirmed that they were.

China's foreign ministry denied that they would ever do such a thing,
but said that they were victims of such attacks themselves.

These revelations have exposed only a tiny part of the problem, which
is being described as the "supply chain problem." These days, any
electronic device contains chips and components from many sources, and
those components themselves may be made up of chips from many sources.
A complex electronic device might contain over 100 chips, sourced from
different locations. If just one of those chips has been infected by
China's military, then the entire device could be compromised. As
soon as the device is turned on, then the malware chip "calls home" to
the Chinese military, which then has access to the entire device,
whether it's an iPhone or a helicopter. Bloomberg and Bloomberg and Krebs on Security and Mashable

****
**** Industry reactions to China's spy chips
****


For months, American intelligence agencies have been advising
Americans not to do business with Chinese chip manufacturers Huawei Technologies Co. or ZTE Corp.

China goes out of its way to tempt Americans to buy their products, by
offering a lot of features and setting very low prices. The Chinese
undoubtedly lose money on these sales, but the sales support a
national effort for China to control as many American electronic
devices as possible, for future warfare.

As a Senior Software Development, I've developed embedded operating
systems for chips, and I personally know how easy it would be for the
Chinese to implement this policy. Huawei could develop a chipset that
works fine during tests, but Huawei could install a "backdoor" into
the chipset. When the chip receives, say, a secret 1024-bit code,
then it will execute commands sent to it by China's military. Thus,
the Chinese are then in control of any devices with Huawei or ZTE
chips. This is not only doable, it's easy to do. The "backdoor"
could not be detected until an attack had been launched, and then it
would be too late. So there's never been any doubt in my mind that
China COULD do this, and if China CAN do it, then they WILL do it,
because they've engaged every part of the nation to prepare for war
with the United States.

That's a different kind of situation than the one that's been revealed
this week. In this week's case, the hacking was done not by
"invisible" software, but by a visible but tiny piece of hardware.

SecurityWeek took a survey of reactions by security experts to the
announcement of China's spy chips, and what was remarkable is that no
one was the least surprised.

Sanjay Beri, CEO, Netskope, said: "Chinese cyber infiltration is
nothing new, as proven by ongoing recent attacks from elite Chinese
institutions diligently working to gain access to assets from the
west."

Itzik Kotler, CTO and Co-Founder, SafeBreach, said: "Like many recent
attacks, this is low-level, stealthy, and widespread. The combination
of these three makes it especially frightening at first, and it
certainly is rare to see such an attack in the wild."

Rick Moy, Chief Marketing Officer at Acalvio said: "While there’s a
lot of denial about the attacks, it’s completely plausible that China
did in fact seed certain hardware with these backdoor chips. One can
imagine the liabilities that firms would rather not take on by
admitting this kind of a breach. However, it is entirely within the
capabilities and mission scope of nation state intel armies to
infiltrate supply chains in this way."

Joseph Carson, chief security scientist at Thycotic said: "We are one
step away from a major cyber conflict or retaliation that could result
in serious implications. This could be one of the biggest hacks in
history. What is clear is that it is a government behind this cyber
espionage and I believe it is compromised employees with privileged
access that are acting as malicious insiders selecting specific
targets so the supply chain has been victim of being compromised."

Malcolm Harkins, Chief Security and Trust Officer, Cylance:
Unfortunately the only surprising element about this attack is that
it’s taken so long to be uncovered in a report." Security Week

****
**** Google is repeating the mistakes that IBM made in helping the Nazis
****


In the late 1930s, Thomas Watson, the founder of IBM Corp. had to
decide whether to sell Hollerith card tabulating equipment to the
German Nazis, at a time when they were persecuting Jews and even
dropping bombs on London. Nominally, the equipment was to be used to
count things like cars and cows, but it was obvious that it could also
be used to count Jews. Watson did business with the Nazis even during
the war, and helped the Nazis with the Holocaust.

Now Google appears to be making the same mistake with China.

Google recently announced it would help the Department of Defense with
AI technology, even for purely defensive purposes.

At the same time, Google announced a major new Google AI research
center in China. “I believe AI and its benefits have no borders” said
Dr. Fei-Fei Li, Chief Scientist at Google Cloud. Well that's a lie.
Google's AI technology will only be used outside the United States
border, and inside China's border.

China is preparing for war with the United States, and has developed
numerous weapons systems with no other purpose than to attack American
cities, bases and aircraft carriers. Google is willing to provide AI
technology to China that can be used in these weapons to attack the
United States, but refuses to allow the U.S. to use its AI technology
to defend itself from China's weapons. That's verging on treason.

China's persecution of the Uighurs and Tibetans in China is worse than
the Nazi persecution of the Jews. Recent reports indicate that over a
million Uighurs are imprisoned in reeducation camps. AI software
provides facial recognition capabilities that permit China to track
the movements of all Uighurs in Xinjiang province (or other Chinese
citizens) for arrest or persecution.

My guess is that during the 1930s it was young German-Americans who
promoted selling IBM technology to the Nazis. Today, with Google
located in Silicon Valley, it's probably young Chinese who are
promoting selling AI technology to the Chinese military, but opposing
its sale to the U.S. military. These Chinese workers will certainly
come to grief for this betrayal of America. Guardian (London, 29-Mar-2002) and Atlantic (April 2014) and Task and Purpose (19-Jun) and The Verge

Related Articles:



KEYS: Generational Dynamics, China, Super Micro Computer Inc.,
Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Huawei Technologies, ZTE Corp.,
IBM, Thomas Watson, Germany, Nazis, Google, Fei-Fei Li,
Uighurs, Tibetans

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
6-Oct-18 World View -- China's spy chip attacks shock the computer industry - by John J. Xenakis - 10-05-2018, 10:50 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,834 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,411 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,699 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,305 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,345 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)