12-06-2019, 09:36 AM
(12-04-2019, 01:05 PM)John J. Xenakis Wrote: ** 04-Dec-2019 Windman
(12-04-2019, 12:16 PM)David Horn Wrote: Really? One witness attended the infamous phone call: LTC Windman. He testified to what was said from direct personal knowledge, and it tallied directly with what the other witnesses said. This is enough by itself to convict in a court of law. If other witnesses weren't refusing to testify out of fear of Trump, I suspect the corroboration would be even greater.
So you believe that a court of law would convict someone of a crime because of Windman's feelings, or on what you "suspect." All the so-called evidence is feelings and assumptions, but under Republican cross-examination, they all had to admit that there was no actual evidence to support their dreams, fantasies, wishful thinking, feelings and assumptions.
As I noted: Windman was there in person. He testified to what he heard in real time. How in God's name can you refer to direct evidence as 'feelings'? Windman cited what he heard -- full stop. Whether that is a criminal offense is open to a court case, and for the last time: this is not a court of law!
John J. Xenakis Wrote:Every single witness was forced to admit under Republican cross-examination that they had no evidence whatsoever to support Adam Schiff's charges. It was all made up. It was all garbage.
You truly live in a fantasy world, where evidence doesn't matter at all. If you really wan t evidence, here is a juicy piece: Trump has either directly or indirectly refused to comply with at least 137 subpoenas. There is no arguing that point. Ignoring subpoenas from Congress is a crime, in and of itself. It was the third article in Nixon's impeachment, and he only ignored a handful.
John J. Xenakis Wrote:Windman's testimony was especially comical because Schiff freaked out and cut him off to prevent him from revealing the name of Schiff's pal, the so-called whistleblower. What a farce.
FYI, the whistleblower's identity is protected by law. Intentionally exposing him or her is a felony, though you seem to believe Trump's cabal should do it anyway.
John J. Xenakis Wrote:You'd make a good CNN commentator. You should apply.
Hardly. Actually, I was supposed to be a lawyer, but I'm totally wrong for that job too.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.
