12-06-2019, 04:43 PM
** 05-Dec-2019 World View: Second American Civil War
I'm reminded of the December 2015 attack by two Muslim jihadist
terrorists in San Bernadino, California, Syed Rizwan Farook (male) and
Tashfeen Malik (female). They shot dead 14 people and wounded dozens
of others. The guns they used were purchased legally, but Democrats
were actually blaming Republicans and Tea Partiers for the terrorist
attack. Obama had already blamed Republicans because they're "bitter"
and they "cling to guns and religion," and now the Democrats were
blaming the Tea Partiers becuase they opposed gun control.
I read some messages by a group of Midwest Conservatives at the time,
and it's hard to overstate how furious they were that they were being
blamed for a jihadist terror attack in California. They lived nowhere
near California, they were mostly contemptuous of California, and they
were legal, responsible gun owners, and yet, the Democrats were
actually blaming them for a jihadist terror attack in California.
Some of them would have shot dead a Democrat if one had been in sight.
Democrats have been inciting and encouraging violence against Tea
Partiers for years, and the incitement is getting more pronounced,
more organic, more genocidal, and more hysterical. They should
realize that if they really want to trigger some sort of civil war,
then it's the Tea Partiers who have the guns.
I agree that these are very dangerous times, particular after the
Russia hoax, the Ukraine hoax, and the impeachment hoax. The
Democrats have experienced one extremely humiliating setback after
another. As I wrote yesterday, every impeachment witness was forced
by Republican cross-examination to completely back down and admit that
there was no evidence whatsoever to support the charges against Trump,
and I've never seen a single media report mention this fact. So the
impeachment hoax is 99.9% certain to be another humiliating defeat for
the Democrats, and they might become even more violent at that time,
or after a Trump reelection.
On the other hand, if somehow the Democrats succeed in eliminating
Trump with the impeachment hoax, then it could be the 63 million Tea
Partiers / Trump supporters who decide to become violent.
When I was a kid, my father, who was a Greek immigrant, told me that
in the 1930s there was so much Communist violence in the country that
he actually thought that the United States would not survive.
Unfortunately, I never asked him why, but I can see it building up
today.
As I said yesterday, I still don't believe that the country is headed
for a civil war, even though the Democrats are apparently pushing in
either that director or tribal genocide against the Tea Partiers. But
if it happens, I suspect that a lot more Democrats than Tea Partiers
will be killed.
Tom Mazanec Wrote:> I posted John's article on the Impeachment hearings and the idea
> of a second ACW on another forum. Here is a response I got:
Quote:> Tom, if you want to hear the opinion of someone who has studied
> the American Civil War for decades, then here it is.
> I believe that we, as a nation, are finding ourselves at a
> dangerous precipice. We are presently living in a time that is
> perilously similar to the sectionalism era that preceded the
> American Civil War, particularly the time between 1859 and
> 1860. While the lines were pretty clear then, they are not as
> clear now. That said, the feelings of resentment and animosity are
> there. We have pAntifa attacking anyone who dares to disagree with
> them, violently and showing an increasing willingness to use
> violence. The level of violence being used is escalating as well.
> The post from that forum is correct in that those targeted by
> pAntifa and 'The Resistance' are becoming increasingly angry at
> the violence and the seeming disregard by LEO's when said violence
> is reported. They are getting angry that the cops seem to ignore
> assaults on them by pAntifa while those who defend themselves tend
> to get arrested and branded as Racists or Nazi's by the media.
> The political Right, not the politicians but the rank and file
> voters, are getting fed up with the "Schiff Show" because of the
> blatantly partisan way they are attacking a duly and
> constitutionally elected president. They are angry because those
> people voted to represent their interests do not seem compelled to
> exercise their authority under the constitution to put an end to
> what we rightly see as a partisan coup.
> As the anger and resentment continues to build on both sides, it
> is not at all hard to imagine that sooner or later, someone is
> going to touch a match to this proverbial powder keg and wide
> spread violence erupt like Krakatoa.
> So, yes, I believe that it is possible and I believe that if it
> happens, it will make the Civil War from 1861-1865 look like a
> leisurely stroll through the park.
> And to be honest, I think that is PRECISELY what the Democrats
> want.
> Then again, that's just the opinion of a grumpy old
> dragon.
I'm reminded of the December 2015 attack by two Muslim jihadist
terrorists in San Bernadino, California, Syed Rizwan Farook (male) and
Tashfeen Malik (female). They shot dead 14 people and wounded dozens
of others. The guns they used were purchased legally, but Democrats
were actually blaming Republicans and Tea Partiers for the terrorist
attack. Obama had already blamed Republicans because they're "bitter"
and they "cling to guns and religion," and now the Democrats were
blaming the Tea Partiers becuase they opposed gun control.
I read some messages by a group of Midwest Conservatives at the time,
and it's hard to overstate how furious they were that they were being
blamed for a jihadist terror attack in California. They lived nowhere
near California, they were mostly contemptuous of California, and they
were legal, responsible gun owners, and yet, the Democrats were
actually blaming them for a jihadist terror attack in California.
Some of them would have shot dead a Democrat if one had been in sight.
Democrats have been inciting and encouraging violence against Tea
Partiers for years, and the incitement is getting more pronounced,
more organic, more genocidal, and more hysterical. They should
realize that if they really want to trigger some sort of civil war,
then it's the Tea Partiers who have the guns.
I agree that these are very dangerous times, particular after the
Russia hoax, the Ukraine hoax, and the impeachment hoax. The
Democrats have experienced one extremely humiliating setback after
another. As I wrote yesterday, every impeachment witness was forced
by Republican cross-examination to completely back down and admit that
there was no evidence whatsoever to support the charges against Trump,
and I've never seen a single media report mention this fact. So the
impeachment hoax is 99.9% certain to be another humiliating defeat for
the Democrats, and they might become even more violent at that time,
or after a Trump reelection.
On the other hand, if somehow the Democrats succeed in eliminating
Trump with the impeachment hoax, then it could be the 63 million Tea
Partiers / Trump supporters who decide to become violent.
When I was a kid, my father, who was a Greek immigrant, told me that
in the 1930s there was so much Communist violence in the country that
he actually thought that the United States would not survive.
Unfortunately, I never asked him why, but I can see it building up
today.
As I said yesterday, I still don't believe that the country is headed
for a civil war, even though the Democrats are apparently pushing in
either that director or tribal genocide against the Tea Partiers. But
if it happens, I suspect that a lot more Democrats than Tea Partiers
will be killed.
