Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 12-Jul-16 World View -- Japan's election opens the way to repeal 'pacifism' constitution clause

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • Increasingly angry China rams Vietnamese boat as tribunal ruling expected
  • Japan's election opens the way to repeal 'pacifism' constitution clause
  • US will send 560 more troops to Iraq

****
**** Increasingly angry China rams Vietnamese boat as tribunal ruling expected
****


[Image: g160711b.jpg]
Nguyen Thi Nang (L) sits next to a radio operator, waiting for news from her husband, captain Vo Van Luu, after his boat was reportedly sunk by Chinese vessels in the South China Sea

In what is likely to be increasingly a sign of things to come, Chinese
vessels on Saturday rammed a Vietnamese fishing boat and sank it, and
then prevented another Vietnamese ship from rescuing the crew members,
as they clung to the sinking ship to keep from drowning. The five
crew members were in the waters for over six hours before the Chinese
ships left, permitting another Vietnamese ship to rescue the crew.
The incident took place in waters that have been fished by Vietnam for
centuries.

China's rhetoric has become increasingly panicky, even publicly
releasing 'evidence' that turns out to be delusional. ( "22-Jun-16 World View -- China's 'ironclad proof' of South China Sea claims revealed as hoax"
)

The rhetoric has worsened approaching July 12, when the United Nations
Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague will issue its
long-awaited ruling on a case brought by the Philippines against China
on the merits of China's claims to the entire South China Sea. The
case is brought under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea (UNCLOS), which China claims does not apply to them. ( "7-Jul-16 World View -- South China Sea tension set to escalate after July 12 arbitration ruling"
)

Here's a typical Chinese media news story:

[indent]<QUOTE>"On the South China Sea issue, some Western media have
spared no efforts to make "news", tapping lies to cover the truth
and misguide public opinions thereon, which is considered by
experts and scholars to be unfair and misleading. ...

A quick glimpse of the website of the U.S. magazine The National
Interest shows that there are quite a number of articles
concerning the South China Sea, including ones titled "China's
Reckless South China Sea Strategy Won't Work", and "China's Bogus
South China Sea Consensus", among others

Almost all of these headlines are biased in opinion and
exaggeratedly worded, without uttering the least responsible words
as a magazine in a big media country.

Japan's The Diplomat, America's Business Insider and the
Washington Post have frequently mentioned in their reports that
China intends to turn the South China Sea into its "internal lake"
or "a Chinese lake".

In doing so, they just turned a blind eye to the fact that the
South China Sea islands have been part of the Chinese territory
under international law and since ancient times, and played up
sensational concepts in a bid to wrench the facts and misguide
their readers.

Some media even simply fabricate stories in order to smear China,
attempting to impress their readers that the situation is tense in
the disputed waters."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

There's a real hysterical quality to this situation. Assuming that
the tribunal rules in favor of the Philippines, the tribunal has no
way to enforce any decision it issues, so China can just ignore the
ruling, which it has already said it would do. But having already
rammed Vietnamese boats, manufactured evidence and made fantastical
claims, China is in an extremely emotional and dangerous state, and
this may have consequences. Sky News (Australia) and Tuoi Tre News (Vietnam) and Xinhua

****
**** Japan's election opens the way to repeal 'pacifism' constitution clause
****


Japan prime minister Shinzo Abe's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) won a
resounding election victory on Sunday that opens the door for Abe to
get Japan's constitution amended to remove the "pacifism" clause,
as I wrote three days ago.

The LDP, along with its coalition partner Komeito, now has a
two-thirds "supermajority" in both the upper and lower houses of the
Diet (parliament). This gives Abe the votes to amend the consitution.

The pacifism clause forbids any military action by the Japanese except
in self-defense on Japanese soil. For Abe, amending this clause is
personal, in that he's following in the path of his grandfather, Kishi
Nobusuke, who served as prime minister of Japan from 1957-60. Kishi
disliked the pacifism clause because it made Japan too dependent on
the United States, and he wanted Japan to be completely self-reliant
in national defense. For Abe, amending this clause would fulfill his
grandfather's wish.

However, even with a super-majority in both houses of the Diet,
removing the pacifism clause will be very difficult because of
widespread opposition to doing so. An exit poll indicates that the
country is deeply divided on this issue, with 36% of the voters
opposing the change and 29.6% supporting it, with 34.4% undecided.

Those who support the change do so because of growing fears about
terrorism, North Korea’s missile and nuclear weapons ambitions and
China’s military assertiveness, while those who oppose it take pride
in the war-renouncing pledge. Japan Today and Japan Times

****
**** US will send 560 more troops to Iraq
****


In yet another flip-flop, the Obama administration announced that it
will send another 560 US troops to Iraq, to fight the so-called
Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh) Defense Secretary Ashton
B. Carter made the announcement on Monday during a surprise visit to
Iraq.

This will bring the number of US troops in Iraq to about 6,000,
including those on temporary assignment. This is a reversal for
President Obama, who promised to withdraw all troops from Iraq, and
did so in December 2011. Since then, Iraq's situation has continued
to deteriorate, and Obama has been forced to abandon his campaign
promises and send troops back to Iraq. One month ago, Obama also
further abandoned his campaign promises to withdraw troops from
Afghanistan. ( "11-Jun-16 World View -- In a reversal, Obama allows US troops in Afghanistan in combat roles"
)

The US troops will be part of an effort to recapture Raqqa, ISIS'
self-declared capital, and Mosul from ISIS. ISIS has occupied Mosul
since June 2014.

According to one analyst, retired Marine general Anthony Zinni,

[indent]<QUOTE>"Reading between the lines, I suspect that he has some
major commitments from the Iraqis, Kurds, and Syrian opposition to
go for the gold. ... I also suspect that Carter is convinced that
Mosul and Raqqa are isolated. It sounds like he will use this to
pressure regional allies to step up their
contributions."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

Zinni was commander of all US forces in the region as chief of
U.S. Central Command from 1997 to 2000. Washington Post and Time


KEYS: Generational Dynamics, China, South China Sea,
Permanent Court of Arbitration, Philippines, Vietnam,
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, UNCLOS,
Shinzo Abe, Liberal Democratic Party, LDP, Komeito,
Kishi Nobusuke, North Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan,
Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh,
Mosul, Raqqa, Anthony Zinni

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
12-Jul-16 World View -- Japan's election opens the way to repeal 'pacifism' clause - by John J. Xenakis - 07-11-2016, 09:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,831 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,410 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,695 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,292 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,342 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)