Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
** 03-May-2020 World View: Partisan hacks vs idiots

(05-03-2020, 11:16 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: > When people describe all members of a political party as being a
> certain way, of having a certain trait that is despised, I asked
> myself if I recognize myself. Do the people in the real world who
> belong to that party fit the description? Most often they don’t.
> You know you are dealing with a partisan hack with a distorted and
> vile picture of his rivals and a political agenda.

> That is not how an interpreter of history ought to behave.

Lol! You must be pretty desperate to resort to that kind of garbage
name-calling.

So I'll just say this: I've lived in NJ and MA. I went to school with
whites and blacks in both states. I've worked in dozens of companies
around whites and blacks. I never saw the kind of blatant racism that
you and other Democrats talk about -- not from Republicans, not from
Democrats. It's a political construct used as a political weapon by
Democrat leaders.

But that kind of racism - separate drinking fountains, separate
schools, etc. - did exist in the Democratic South, and I'm told that
today it still does to some extent.

I'm sure you consider it "vile" that I would have the temerity to talk
about Democrats supporting slavery, the Democrats lynching and raping
blacks through the KKK for a century, and so forth. Democrats hate
talking about those things, so it's not surprising they would call any
mention of them "vile."

And it shouldn't be surprising to anyone that after supporting slavery
and the KKK for over a century, the "vile" Democrat leaders would not
change their stripes just because of a political agreement between LBJ
and MLK. In fact, if that political agreement didn't, in some way,
continue the "vile" policies of the preceding century, that would be
shocking. People don't change their "vile" attitudes overnight
because of some agreement between élite politicians.

So I describe those policies and how the worked -- the ghettoization
of blacks, the destruction of the black family, the control of blacks
through poverty and control of welfare, and the resulting violent
black enclave ghettos in cities like Chicago. Those are actual facts,
completely visible today, whose history and development is backed up
by hundreds of quotes from Democrat leaders and feminist leaderss,
that I quoted and referenced in my book. You may not like the "vile"
activities of the politicians that you worship in the Democratic
party, but they are "vile" people no doubt. You should consider
becoming a Trump supporter. What have you got to lose?

Finally, I'll make one more distinction that may clarify things. When
I was writing my book on China, someone read a draft and said I was in
danger of being called "racist." Since then I've been extremely
clear, and I've said it over and over again. The Chinese are
wonderful people, whether they're in Taiwan, Hong Kong, mainland
China, or elsewhere. The evil criminal organization is the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP), not the Chinese people.

So I'm making the same distinction. It's not you that are supporting
the "vile" policies of the Democrats. It's the Democratic leadership,
the people in power, the 1%, the people who stand to make millions
while everyone else suffers. So when Trump said, "What have you got
to lose?" he was talking directly to the black people, helping them to
understand how "vile" the Democrat leadership is.

So when I said, "That's how the Democrats work," I meant, "That's how
the Democrat Party leadership works." I apologize for not making that
distinction earlier.

(By the way, Democrats exhibit a similar confusion in reverse, when
they talk about hating Trump. What they really hate are the Tea
Partiers and the 63 million Trump supporters. Hating 63 million
people really is "vile.")
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by John J. Xenakis - 05-03-2020, 12:02 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,835 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,413 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,703 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,309 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,345 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 45 Guest(s)