08-11-2020, 06:47 PM
** 11-Aug-2020 World View: S&H Theory
Lol. You claim to be defending S&H theory, but instead you're
rejecting S&H theory and instead you're defending some made-up theory
about arrows of progress that exists only in your mind, and bears no
resemblance to generational theory. That's your business, but you
aren't defending S&H theory at all.
Once again, I'm the only remaining member of the FT forum who believes
that generational theory is valid.
(08-11-2020, 10:08 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: > I think there is much validity still. I have defended S&H
> orthodoxy against many who take it astray. But it was a theory.
> It was and remains not the only source of wisdom. They missed
> some stuff. Seeing your Industrial Age interpretation of crisis
> triggers applied to the Information Age situation I cringe.
> Seeing you not count nukes as making major powers want to avoid
> crisis wars as much as have one in living memory is
> doubtful.
Lol. You claim to be defending S&H theory, but instead you're
rejecting S&H theory and instead you're defending some made-up theory
about arrows of progress that exists only in your mind, and bears no
resemblance to generational theory. That's your business, but you
aren't defending S&H theory at all.
Once again, I'm the only remaining member of the FT forum who believes
that generational theory is valid.