01-18-2021, 11:39 AM
(01-17-2021, 07:30 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:(01-16-2021, 10:34 AM)David Horn Wrote: If so, that would leave an enormous paper trail, and no one is arguing that so far.
Actually, we are. That's what the signature audit requests in Georgia were for. We didn't believe there were envelopes for all the ballots - especially since the envelopes permit unfolded ballots while there were a lot of folded balots - and a full signature audit would show that, if prompt enough to prevent the envelopes from being manufactured.
The state responded with a "sampled" signature audit, which is pretty much an admission that the full set of envelopes don't exist - because the ballots were introduced by election officials, without ever being in envelopes.
Thanks for making the point I raised but you deleted. Perfection is impossible, so any attempt at achieving it will be regarded as inadequate by someone. Let's admit it. You're asking the election authorities to prove a negative: there was no fraud. You know perfectly well that's impossible or so cumbersome that it can't be achieved. On the other hand, finding evidence of fraud should be easy, especially so in cases of mass fraud. As I wrote: crickets. If you can show otherwise, please do.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.
