Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
** 17-May-2021 World View: The 'Pilgrimage' and the 'Insurrection'

(05-17-2021, 09:33 AM)David Horn Wrote: > I've made the pilgrimage to Fox for the "healing" waters. Sorry,
> but even a rank novice can see through their mist. It's
> impossible to ignore the 6th of January, but Fox managed it
> nonetheless. And the drivel they spread when it's directly offset
> by video of the events they misrepresent should be enough to seal
> the deal. Apparently not.

> January 6th was only the worst of many misrepresentations. If it
> happens once or twice, it may be accidental or just sloppy. If it
> happens constantly, it's intentional and possibly
> slanderous... yet you persist.

What the hell are you talking about? Fox News hasn't ignored the Jan
6 events. They have politicians -- both Republican and Democrat -- on
all the time who refer to it as an "insurrection." And did you know
that Liz Chenez was interviewed several times in the last few days,
and allowed to rant on air endlessly about Trump's danger to
democracy, and that those views were debated on air by Republicans and
Democrats? Of course you don't know any of that, because your
puppetmasters have censored that information, and don't want you to
know. Idiotically, you believe everything your puppetmasters tell
you.

That's why it's almost impossible to talk to you and other leftists.
You have absolutely no idea what's going on. Your ignorance is
cavernous at the Grand Canyon level. One "pilgrimage" doesn't make
you an expert on anything. All you know is what the Democrat
Puppetmasters want you to know.

And this is what makes me angry. Your remarks to me are "vulgar and
offensive," to use Brower's phrase. But like Brower and other
leftists, you don't give a shit about actual facts. You make up
vulgar and offensive crap all the time and pass judgment about things
you know nothing about. Your God is the shithead Adam Schiff who does
this on a daily basis.

Sure, let's take the so-called "insurrection" as an example.

I actually haven't followed the issue that closely, but there are
things that I recall from the coverage I've heard. One is that the
Democrats immediately declared it to be an attempt by Donald Trump to
overthrow the government, even though he would have no motive to do
so. He was actually calling for a peaceful protest, as can be seen by
anyone who reads what he actually said.

In his January 6 speech, Donald Trump gave a lengthy description of
the many examples of massive election fraud, and called for peaceful
protests. You can read it here:

-- Donald Trump Speech “Save America” Rally Transcript January 6
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/don...-january-6
(Rev.com, 6-Jan-2021)

But none of that matters to you and other Democrats. They declared it
to be an insurrection, and anyone who even questions that is
"slanderous," a word that brings your levels of ignorance and
stupidity to astronomic levels.

So as I said, the "insurrection" has been debated every day on Fox
News by both Republicans and Democrats. The one person who has done
extensive reporting on the "insurrection" is Sean Hannity. As I also
said, I haven't followed the details closely, but here are some things
that I remember hearing, that you would know nothing about because
your censorious puppetmasters don't want you to know:
  • The Democrats declared it an "insurrection" immediately, not
    knowing any facts, and know-nothing puppets like you simply mouthed
    the words you were given.

  • The "insurrectionist" Trump supporters were not carrying a single
    weapon. The only weapons were the guns carried by the capitol
    police.

  • No one was harmed or killed by the "insurrectionist" Trump
    supporters. The one person who was killed during the "insurrection"
    was a female Trump supporter who was shot dead by a Capitol policeman.
    The Democrats are refusing to release the name of the shooter. We can
    assume that the shooter was a Trump-hater shooting and killing a Trump
    supporter, which is not something that the Democrats would want anyone
    to know.

  • In fact, there's a lot of information that the Democrats are
    refusing to release, almost certainly because it would implicate the
    Democrats in the "insurrection." Democrats are being as sleazy as
    possible by hiding information.

  • The FBI has been investigating and sometimes jailing without
    charges people who were simply present at Trump's rally, whom the
    identified using facial recognition software. I'm sure you applaud
    that because you hate all Trump supporters, but that's what's been
    going on.

  • We hear endlessly about George Floyd, but there's no talk of
    massive number of black murders by other blacks, on the streets of
    cities run by Democrats, or of prisoners let out onto the streets so
    that they can kill other blacks. We believe that it's Democrat Party
    policy for as many blacks as possible to kill other blacks, since if
    Democrats even cared about blacks killing blacks on their streets,
    they'd do something about it, or at least talk about it.

  • Meanwhile, there's no talk of the real "insurrection" going on, by
    the Democrat Party's fascist antifa-blm militias.

As I said, I haven't followed all the details about the so-called
"insurrection," so if you want to know more about the above, you'll
have to do your own research.

The above is a great deal of information, but I know you don't care
about any of it, so I was only typing it mainly for my own benefit. I
realize you couldn't care less because, like shithead Adam Schiff and
all Democrats, you want to just make one vulgar and offensive
accusation after another and, when the facts prove one of them wrong,
you just move on to the next vulgar and offensive accusation. So
enjoy!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by John J. Xenakis - 05-17-2021, 03:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,836 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,415 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,703 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,310 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,345 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 48 Guest(s)