(06-27-2021, 08:59 AM)John J. Xenakis Wrote: ** 27-Jun-2021 World View: Democrat Party trollery
(06-27-2021, 04:12 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: > By altering ballots after the fact the "auditors" in Arizona have
> effectively made any further audit impossible -- and theirs
> unreliable. Strike 1.
That's a lie. You forgot to say that the auditors are racist white
supremacist terrorist insurrectionists like all Trump supporters.
You're exhibiting the kind of hysteria from desperate Democrat Party
trolls that I was talking about.
No, they are more subtle than that. They are more willing to do manipulation than brute force.
Quote:(06-27-2021, 04:12 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: > Comment on how Media Bias Fact Check sees RedState. It is far to
> the Right, which is suspect in its own right.
Of course RedState is a conservative news source. Your pals in the
Democrat Party have set up a Stalinist Fascist censorship regime where
anyone who dares to report on the truth about the election fraud or
the truth about the "insurrection" hoax is canceled or destroyed. So
instead of criticizing RedState for being conservative, you should be
congratulating them for being willing to speak truth to power by
standing up to the vicious Stalinist Fascist Democrat Party censorship
regime.
The real heroes of today are those that speak truth to power, and who
stand up to the Fascist Democrat Party, and special notice must be
made of thost brave parents standing up to the Fascist school boards
indoctrinating children with hate-filled Critical Race "Theory," just
as the Chinese Communists indoctrinate children in school to hate
Christians and Democracy.
As troubling, as I noticed, is that the reliability of news reporting from RedState is at best "mixed". It is not quite as ludicrously awful as (North) Korean Central News Agency which is consistently unreliable or the madness of Alex Jones' Infowars or sites (I assume disbanded) still loyal to the Iraqi Ba'ath Party/Satan Hussein. RedState is about as reliable as state media of Russia and China.
'Mixed' results imply that one sometimes gets truth and sometimes does not.
Quote:(06-27-2021, 04:12 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: > If you want to dispute a landslide margin, then you need proof of
> major dishonesty, like more people voting than votes counted, with
> a large number of votes destroyed or not transmitted.
The audits are apparently turning up proof of exactly that kind of
major dishonesty by the crooked Democrats in several states. I expect
the results of the audits to become public in the fall.
Auditors? Obviously these 'auditors" are not the sorts who work for CPA firms who seek objectivity in judging accounting records and data behind them for reliability in financial statements.
You are predicting something that might more easily be disproved.
I am shocked that there are no watermarks on ballots that would make the paper useless on subsequent elections. I would suggest that.
[/quote]
Quote:[quote pid='77713' dateline='1624802390']
(06-27-2021, 04:12 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: > Give credit to public officials for doing everything possible to
> thwart any possible electoral fraud.
Lol! That's like giving credit to a rapist for doing everything
possible to thwart any possible rape, while he's in the middle of
raping your wife.
[/quote]
No, both Parties have sought to ensure the integrity of the vote from various forms of manipulation and fraud. They have sought to ensure that tampering with voting devices, insertion of forged ballots, and the losing of valid ballots does not happen. Elections are important enough that the standards appropriate for financial accounting of cash and other valuable resources are in place for the vote.
Is your problem with people 'voting wrong', which means not voting as you believe that they should vote? I could make a similar case that poor white people in the Mountain and Deep South 'vote wrong' because they align themselves with economic elitists who do them no tangible good.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.
