Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
** 10-Jul-2021 World View: Why Trump supporters believe the election was stolen

The Democrats are always expressing faux outrage and astonishment and
ridicule that tens of millions of Trump supporters believe that the
2020 election was rigged, and stolen from Trump by the Democrats.

On his show on Friday night, Tucker Carlson read an entire long essay
in the form of a twitter thread explaining why Trump supporters
believe the election was stolen. The twitter feed was from Darryl
Cooper (@MartyrMade).

What's interesting about this essay is that it shows an evolution of
thought, from believing that the Democrats and the media would treat
Trump fairly to believing that they would do anything, no matter how
illegal or disastrous, to regain power from Trump. In the end, Cooper
suggests that if Trump had won the election, they might have had him
killed.

It's well worthwhile to take a few minutes to read through Cooper's
entire essay:

Quote:> "I think I’ve had discussions w/enough Boomer-tier
> Trump supporters who believe the 2020 election was fraudulent to
> extract a general theory about their perspective. It is also the
> perspective of most of the people at the Capitol on 1/6, and
> probably even Trump himself. 1/x

> Most believe some or all of the theories involving midnight
> ballots, voting machines, etc, but what you find when you talk to
> them is that, while they’ll defend those positions w/info they got
> from Hannity or Breitbart or whatever, they’re not particularly
> attached to them. 2/x

> Here are the facts – actual, confirmed facts – that shape their
> perspective: 1) The FBI/etc spied on the 2016 Trump campaign using
> evidence manufactured by the Clinton campaign. We now know that
> all involved knew it was fake from Day 1 (see: Brennan’s July 2016
> memo, etc). 3/x

> These are Tea Party people. The types who give their kids a pocket
> Constitution for their birthday and have Founding Fathers memes in
> their bios. The intel community spying on a presidential campaign
> using fake evidence (incl forged documents) is a big deal to
> them. 4/x

> Everyone involved lied about their involvement as long as they
> could. We only learned the DNC paid for the manufactured evidence
> because of a court order. Comey denied on TV knowing the DNC paid
> for it, when we have emails from a year earlier proving that he
> knew. 5/x

> This was true with everyone, from CIA Dir Brennan & Adam Schiff –
> who were on TV saying they’d seen clear evidence of collusion
> w/Russia, while admitting under oath behind closed doors that they
> hadn’t – all the way down the line. In the end we learned that it
> was ALL fake. 6/x

> At first, many Trump ppl were worried there must be some
> collusion, because every media & intel agency wouldn’t make it up
> out of nothing. When it was clear that they had made it up,
> people expected a reckoning, and shed many illusions about their
> gov’t when it didn’t happen. 7/x

> We know as fact: a) The Steele dossier was the sole evidence used
> to justify spying on the Trump campaign, b) The FBI knew the
> Steele dossier was a DNC op, c) Steele’s source told the FBI the
> info was unserious, d) they did not inform the court of any of
> this and kept spying. 8/x

> Trump supporters know the collusion case front and back. They went
> from worrying the collusion must be real, to suspecting it might
> be fake, to realizing it was a scam, then watched as every
> institution – agencies, the press, Congress, academia – gaslit
> them for another year. 9/x

> Worse, collusion was used to scare people away from working in the
> administration. They knew their entire lives would be
> investigated. Many quit because they were being bankrupted by
> legal fees. The DoJ, press, & gov’t destroyed lives and actively
> subverted an elected admin. 10/x

> This is where people whose political identity was largely defined
> by a naive belief in what they learned in Civics class began to
> see the outline of a Regime that crossed all institutional
> boundaries. Because it had stepped out of the shadows to unite
> against an interloper. 11/x

> GOP propaganda still has many of them thinking in terms of
> partisan binaries, but A LOT of Trump supporters see that the
> Regime is not partisan. They all know that the same institutions
> would have taken opposite sides if it was a Tulsi Gabbard vs Jeb
> Bush election. 12/x

> It’s hard to describe to people on the left (who are used to
> thinking of gov’t as a conspiracy ... Watergate, COINTELPRO, WMD,
> etc) how shocking & disillusioning this was for people who
> encourage their sons to enlist in the Army, and hate ppl who don’t
> stand for the Anthem. 13/x

> They could have managed the shock if it only involved the
> government. But the behavior of the corporate press is really
> what radicalized them. They hate journalists more than they hate
> any politician or gov’t official, because they feel most betrayed
> by them. 14/x

> The idea that the press is driven by ratings/sensationalism became
> untenable. If that were true, they’d be all over the Epstein
> story. The corporate press is the propaganda arm of the Regime
> they now see in outline. Nothing anyone says will ever make them
> unsee that, period. 15/x

> This is profoundly disorienting. Many of them don’t know for
> certain whether ballots were faked in November 2020, but they know
> for absolute certain that the press, the FBI, etc would lie to
> them if there was. They have every reason to believe that, and
> it’s probably true. 16/x

> They watched the press behave like animals for four years. Tens of
> millions of people will always see Kavanaugh as a gang rapist,
> based on nothing, because of CNN. And CNN seems proud of
> that. They led a lynch mob against a high school kid. They cheered
> on a summer of riots. 17/x

> They always claimed the media had liberal bias, fine,
> whatever. They still thought the press would admit truth if they
> were cornered. Now they don’t. It’s a different thing to watch
> them invent stories whole cloth in order to destroy regular lives
> and spark mass violence. 18/x

> Time Mag told us that during the 2020 riots, there were weekly
> conference calls involving, among others, leaders of the protests,
> the local officials who refused to stop them, and media people who
> framed them for political effect. In Ukraine we call that a color
> revolution. 19/x

> Throughout the summer, Democrat governors took advantage of COVID
> to change voting procedures. It wasn’t just the mail-ins (they
> lowered signature matching standards, etc). After the collusion
> scam, the fake impeachment, Trump ppl expected shenanigans by
> now. 20/x

> Re: “fake impeachment”, we now know that Trump’s request for
> Ukraine to cooperate w/the DOJ regarding Biden’s $ activities in
> Ukraine was in support of an active investigation being pursued by
> the FBI and Ukraine AG at the time, and so a completely legitimate
> request. 21/x

> Then you get the Hunter laptop scandal. Big Tech ran a full-on
> censorship campaign against a major newspaper to protect a
> political candidate. Period. Everyone knows it, all of the Tech
> companies now admit it was a “mistake” – but, ya know, the
> election’s over, so who cares? 22/x

> Goes w/o saying, but: If the NY Times had Don Jr’s laptop, full of
> pics of him smoking crack and engaging in group sex, lots of lurid
> family drama, emails describing direct corruption and backed up by
> the CEO of the company they were using, the NYT wouldn’t have been
> banned. 23/x

> Think back: Stories about Trump being pissed on by Russian
> prostitutes and blackmailed by Putin were promoted as fact, and
> the only evidence was a document paid for by his opposition and
> disavowed by its source. The NY Post was banned for reporting on
> true information. 24/x

> The reaction of Trump ppl to all this was not, “no fair!” That’s
> how they felt about Romney’s “binders of women” in 2012. This is
> different. Now they see, correctly, that every institution is
> captured by ppl who will use any means to exclude them from the
> political process. 25/x

> And yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. He got 13m more
> votes than in 2016, 10m more than Clinton got! As election night
> dragged on, they allowed themselves some hope. But when the four
> critical swing states (and only those states) went dark at
> midnight, they knew. 26/x

> Over the ensuing weeks, they got shuffled around by grifters and
> media scam artists selling them conspiracy theories. They latched
> onto one, then another increasingly absurd theory as they tried to
> put a concrete name on something very real. 27/x

> Media & Tech did everything to make things worse. Everything about
> the election was strange – the changes to procedure, unprecedented
> mail-in voting, the delays, etc – but rather than admit that and
> make everything transparent, they banned discussion of it (even in
> DMs!). 28/x

> Everyone knows that, just as Don Jr’s laptop would’ve been the
> story of the century, if everything about the election dispute was
> the same, except the parties were reversed, suspicions about the
> outcome would’ve been Taken Very Seriously. See 2016 for
> proof. 29/x

> Even the courts’ refusal of the case gets nowhere w/them, because
> of how the opposition embraced mass political violence. They’ll
> say, w/good reason: What judge will stick his neck out for Trump
> knowing he’ll be destroyed in the media as a violent mob burns
> down his house? 30/x

> It’s a fact, according to Time Magazine, that mass riots were
> planned in cities across the country if Trump won. Sure, they were
> “protests”, but they were planned by the same people as during the
> summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant. Judges have
> families, too. 31/x

> Forget the ballot conspiracies. It’s a fact that governors used
> COVID to unconstitutionally alter election procedures (the
> Constitution states that only legislatures can do so) to help
> Biden to make up for a massive enthusiasm gap by gaming the
> mail-in ballot system. 32/x

> They knew it was unconstitutional, it’s right there in plain
> English. But they knew the cases wouldn’t see court until after
> the election. And what judge will toss millions of ballots
> because a governor broke the rules? The threat of mass riots
> wasn’t implied, it was direct. 33/x

> a) The entrenched bureaucracy & security state subverted Trump
> from Day 1, b) The press is part of the operation, c) Election
> rules were changed, d) Big Tech censors opposition, e) Political
> violence is legitimized & encouraged, f) Trump is banned from
> social media. 34/x

> They were led down some rabbit holes, but they are absolutely
> right that their gov’t is monopolized by a Regime that believes
> they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to
> keep them getting it. Trump fans should be happy he lost; it
> might’ve kept him alive. /end"


-- Darryl Cooper @MartyrMade / Must-Read Twitter Thread: Here’s Why We
KNOW the 2020 Election Was Stolen
https://noqreport.com/2021/07/09/must-re...as-stolen/
(Noq Report, 9-Jul-2021)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by John J. Xenakis - 07-11-2021, 09:41 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,835 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,413 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,703 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,309 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,345 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 60 Guest(s)