Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
** 03-Aug-2021 World View: Why would China not exist without CCP leadership?

The 2003 speech of General Chi Haotian is a long, complex strategy
document that the CCP has been following in detail for the last almost
20 years.

** 31-Jul-21 World View -- Wuhan Coronavirus -- Thinking the Unthinkable
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/x...tm#e210731



The following claim by Chi Haotian was one of the most startling:

Quote:> "Everyone knows that without the leadership of our
> Party, China would not exist today. Therefore, our highest
> principle is to forever protect our Party’s leadership
> position. Before June 4 [1989 Tiananmen Square massacre], we
> realized vaguely that as long as China’s economy is developed,
> people would support and love the Communist Party. Therefore we
> had to use several decades of peacetime to develop China’s
> economy. ... But the June 4 riot gave our Party a warning and gave
> us a lesson that is still fresh."

What could that possibly mean? Why would China not exist without the
CCP? And what warning did the Tiananmen Square massacre give,
and what's the lesson?

I believe the key is to look at the last three imperial dynasties:
  • Yuan Dynasty (1279–1368) -- China was conquered and ruled by
    the Mongols.
  • Ming Dynasty (1368–1644) -- China was ruled by the Chinese,
    ending in massive corruption.
  • Qing Dynasty (1644–1911) -- China was conquered and ruled by the
    Manchus (from Manchuria)

In most of the last millennium, China was governed by non-Chinese
ethnic groups, the Mongols and the Manchus. During those
periods, China effectively did not exist. The land area might
have been called "Extended Mongolia" and "Extended Manchuria" during
the Yuan and Qing dynasties, respectively, but not China. China
did not exist.

So Chi Haotian said that the lesson learned was that without the CCP,
China would collapse like the Ming Dynasty, and then be invaded
and governed by another group, perhaps the Tibetans or the Uighurs.
So China will no longer exist without the CCP.

The Chinese considered the Manchus to be "barbarians." (Of course,
the Chinese consider us to be barbarians, as well.)

Nontheless, the Manchu population of about half a million was able to
conquer the Ming Dynasty and govern China for over two and one-half
centuries.

What this shows, more than anything, is that the Chinese are
incompetent to govern themselves.

What is Chi Haotian's solution to prevent the collapse of the CCP?

Quote:> "After some deep pondering, we finally come to this
> conclusion: Only by turning our developed national strength into
> the force of a first striking outward – only by leading people to
> go out – can we win forever the Chinese people’s support and love
> for the Communist Party. Our party will then stand on invincible
> ground, and the Chinese people will have to depend on the
> Communist Party. They will forever follow the Communist Party with
> their hearts and minds, as was written in a couplet frequently
> seen in the countryside some years ago: “Listen to Chairman Mao,
> follow the Communist Party!”"

The solution is "first striking outward" -- a war -- and then "leading
people to go out" -- colonize the conquered land. And America is the
chosen land.

According to Chi: "We must not forget that the history of our
civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow
two tigers to live together."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by John J. Xenakis - 08-03-2021, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,835 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,412 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,701 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,308 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,345 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 48 Guest(s)