08-25-2021, 09:46 PM
** 25-Aug-2021 World View: Whitmer kidnapping hoax
I guess this is really hard for you to understand. In both the Whitmer
kidnapping hoax and the insurrection hoax, FBI informants were used to
entrap the participants, which is illegal. Stalin wouldn't hesitate
to put someone in jail if it was revealed that the KGB had committed
entrapment.
However, there was a big difference between the two cases. When the
Whitmer kidnapping hoax was prosecuted, the role of the FBI was
revealed, which was embarrassing to the FBI and prosecution, though it
isn't preventing them from sending the poor slob to jail for the crime
of being a Trump supporter. But in the insurrection hoax, the Justice
Dept. is dropping the charges, saying that there's "scant evidence."
Why did they leak the "scant evidence" claim? So that the case won't
be prosecuted and the FBI won't be embarrassed again by having their
role revealed, as they were in the Whitmer case.
I told you that last time. I know that it requires a higher reading
comprehension level than you have, but try reading what I've written a
few times so that it will sink in.
(08-25-2021, 09:08 PM)pbrower2a Wrote: > Well, well, well. The first domino falls in the Michigan plot. It
> has taken nearly a year, and one of the participants got off
> lightly in what could have been a life sentence had the plot been
> initiated and even a federal death sentence had it resulted in the
> murder of the Governor of Michigan. 75 months (six years and three
> months) followed by three years of probation looks lenient for
> what he did. The first to rat on other conspirators usually gets
> by far the lightest sentence.
I guess this is really hard for you to understand. In both the Whitmer
kidnapping hoax and the insurrection hoax, FBI informants were used to
entrap the participants, which is illegal. Stalin wouldn't hesitate
to put someone in jail if it was revealed that the KGB had committed
entrapment.
However, there was a big difference between the two cases. When the
Whitmer kidnapping hoax was prosecuted, the role of the FBI was
revealed, which was embarrassing to the FBI and prosecution, though it
isn't preventing them from sending the poor slob to jail for the crime
of being a Trump supporter. But in the insurrection hoax, the Justice
Dept. is dropping the charges, saying that there's "scant evidence."
Why did they leak the "scant evidence" claim? So that the case won't
be prosecuted and the FBI won't be embarrassed again by having their
role revealed, as they were in the Whitmer case.
I told you that last time. I know that it requires a higher reading
comprehension level than you have, but try reading what I've written a
few times so that it will sink in.
