08-26-2021, 05:32 AM
(08-25-2021, 09:24 PM)John J. Xenakis Wrote: ** 25-Aug-2021 World View: Getting help
(08-24-2021, 10:36 AM)David Horn Wrote: > John -- get help. Seriously. 90% of this is fantasy (I snipped a
> lot of it, but left enough to make my point). There are several
> excellent videos of the January 6th invasion of the Capitol. The
> one by the Washington Post is short but still excellent. The
> 40-minute version by the NY Times (taken from all sides of the
> Capitol and all available interiors) is even better. And btw,
> most areas of the building are alwasy closed to the puiblic for
> obvious reasons.
> And your argument that the Democrats are destroying the public and
> getting them hooked on drugs is really a push. Blame the Sacklers
> for that one. Oh yeah, they're Republicans, fwiw.
As you say, parts of the Capitol are open to the public, and walking
through the Capitol is not a crime that should put you in jail for
months -- unless, of course, you're a Trump supporter. Occam's Razor
tells you that a trespasser is simply trespassing, not insurrecting.
It depends upon what is going on in the Capitol. If the vote is on naming a post office, then maybe we get to see it. If it is the CIA budget we obviously don't.
The term "trespassing" typically involves entering real property without permission. Thus if someone takes a shortcut across my lawn that is technically trespassing. I wouldn't make a stink about a child using my driveway as a shortcut to get to or from a school bus. On the other hand if someone crosses my property to do some damage, like to commit vandalism, I would certainly press charges for trespassing. With buildings (houses, barns, sheds, chicken coops, commercial establishments, houses of faith), rail cars, motor vehicles, boats, or aircraft entry with the intention of committing a crime is burglary. An open door to a business is something that we all understand. This said, if one stays after the business is closed or enters store rooms generally closed to the public one is committing burglary. The people who entered the Capitol building without obvious consent were technically burglars.
I have visited the Capitol three times: in 1967 (with my parents), and twice in the 1970's (on the way to a band festival). The Capitol is awesome. It is a place of reverence for what has gone on there. Law defines the United States as a political order, and short of life-saving in medicine or military service in defense of my country I can imagine no more important responsibility in work than to make the law, vote on the law, or assist in its design. Emancipation Proclamation, establishment of National Parks,. declarations of war, ratification of treaties, the GI Bill, enacting the Interstate Highway program, the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, the Americans with Disabilities Act... it was all done there. Not in some cavern about which nobody knows. Ratifying the results of the Electoral College is a standard ceremony that rarely draws attention of the media, but this time people in the Capitol made a mockery by trying to undo the results of an election that went as they didn't like. Most of us experience that half the time or so. Some never get it right because they vote for Parties or Candidates who have no meaningful chance.
I didn't see any BLACK LIVES MATTER banners. I saw no rainbow (LGBT) flags. I saw nobody with an image of Che Guevara, Vladimir Lenin, Mao Zedong, or other commies. I did see Trump banners which do not belong in the Capitol. I did see some Confederate flags.
I heard someone shout "HANG MIKE PENCE!", which would be extremely disgusting if it came from my side.
Quote:Well, I got help. I doubled my meds. Then I doubled them again. I
called a psychologist. Then I called a psychiatrist. Then I called a
neurologist. Then I called another psychiatrist. Then I reviewed all
the news reports. I reviewed videos. I reviewed all the analyses.
You could not have done that; I think you are too smart. To put it as delicately as I can, the physician that you should have seen is a proctologist.
Quote:And the answer came out the same. The videos and reports all showed
individual peaceful protesters. There was no "insurrection" on
January 6. That's your fantasy. You're the one with the fantasy. It
was a hoax staged by the Democrats with the use of FBI infiltration,
following the staged kidnapping hoax of Gov Whitmer, also using FBI
infiltration.
Peaceful protesters? Peaceful protesters are the sorts who take a camera-wielding cell phone with them, perhaps expecting to document police brutality and instead end up documenting riotous acts. Should I get video of someone torching a police car, then that video goes to law enforcement or prosecution.
Quote:As for Brower, Horn and Meece, you people are like Adam Schiff. You
remember that jackass Adam Schiff, don't you? He lies every day.
Remember his ridiculous laughable lies during the Ukraine impeachment
hoax? Just like you three. You don't give a shit what you say.
You're just Democrat party trolls. You say what the Democrats tell
you to say. The Democrats say what Nancy Pelosi tells them to say.
Nancy Pelosi says what "The Squad" tells her today, and the girls in
"The Squad" hate America and undoubtedly are bragging to the people
back home how they sabotaging the country in policy after policy,
which makes them evil and you equally evil for supporting them. Every
single policy of the Democrats has the purpose of destroying the
country.
If you consider a tiger's tail a leg, then how many legs does the usual tiger have? Four. No matter what you say, a tail is not a leg.
I have had arguments with people who called the Holocaust the "Holohoax". So I explain all the solid evidence from eyewitness testimony from perpetrators, survivors, bystanders, and liberators. I show that Jewish populations once large virtually disappeared. People might have appeared in Censuses as Jews or might have been identified in some way that suggests that they were Jewish (as in having Yiddish as one's first language in Poland or Ladino -- an archaic Spanish close to the original language in which Cervantes used in writing Don Quixote) in Greek. The Dutch re-opened synagogues to such Jews as would return for worship. About 90% of Dutch Jews were exterminated. Before the war the Netherlands was a good place in which to be a Jew. It would be again. I mentioned evidence put into criminal trials of perpetrators -- orders, requisitions, personnel records, payrolls, accounting ledgers, and death lists. One of the nastiest of the Nazis, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, denied that the initials on damning evidence were his. He did not deny the reality of the documents calling for murders.
So what do I get for denouncing the Holocaust deniers? I get called a "dirty Jew" who "sees gentiles as goyim" Heck, I am likely descended from some families, parts of which went to the New World and parts of which stayed in Germany around 1750... and the descendants of some of those who stayed probably were major Nazi war criminals. My mother's maiden name is the same as some Hungarian general of German origin (he Magyarized his name at some point) who was convicted by Yugoslavia for major war crimes. yes, he was guilty. I have ancestors named Hess (as in Rudolf) and Funk (as in Walter, the President of the Reichsbank who fenced the loot such as wedding rings, gold teeth, gold eyeglass frames, cash and currency, and other treasures) from murdered Jews. Sure, I hate Nazis. It is impossible to be a good person these days and not hate Nazis. I told that Nazi sympathizer that if I had to choose between being a Jew and a Nazi I would choose Judaism because as a Jew I would have fewer cultural or moral compromises to make.
So you say that talking about the massive inflow of drugs across the
southern border is "really a push"? You three guys are total idiots.
Quote:-- Fentanyl seizures at U.S. southern border rise dramatically
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigra...y-n1272676
(NBC News, 29-Jun-2021)
And so, Brower, Horn and Meece, you three are total idiots, in
addition to being pathetic and evil. But, let's face it, you fit in
well with your president.
FCUK fentanyl.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.
