Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
** 26-Aug-2021 World View: Ukraine quid pro quo

shoshin Wrote:> John, you have an.odd definition of "recant." When the Republican
> puppets on the committee asked the witnesses if Donald Trump
> actually said " I'll deliver those weapons if you dig up dirt on
> Biden," they had to respond (being under oath) " No, not those
> words." Bur everyone in that room, and everyone watching, and
> everyone who listened to the call knew EXACTLY what he meant. But
> don't believe your lying ears and eyes.

My eyes and ears saw and heard the entire hearing, and my eyes and
ears were not lying, and have never lied. What you've written above
is total nonsense, so it's you that have no idea what was going on.
In fact, I interpret your statement about "knew EXACTLY" as an
admission that you're purposely lying about what happened. Or maybe
your eyes and ears are the liars. Or maybe it's just your mouth.
This is typical of left-wing Democrats.

Here's what I posted on December 3, 2019:

Quote:> "I've been saying for years that a new American Civil
> War is impossible, and I still believe that to be true, but I've
> definitely been shaken up by the impeachment hearings.

> I actually listened to the five days of public testimony live. I
> don't know how many people are going to read this posting, but I
> doubt that any one of them besides myself did that.

> It was very depressing, because after each day's testimony, I
> would listen to the news on the BBC or Al-Jazeera or MS-NBC later,
> and the news reports bore absolutely no relationship to what
> actually happened. They were total lies -- and I know this
> because I saw and heard it with my own eyes.

> Every single witness was forced to admit under Republican
> cross-examination that they had no evidence whatsoever to support
> Adam Schiff's charges. It was all made up. It was all garbage.
> But every single news report lied about it, saying something like
> "Today, Ambassador X gave explosive testimony that Trump withheld
> aid from Ukraine until Ukraine started investigating Joe and
> Hunter Biden." In fact, all the news reports used the same words,
> indicating that they were all reading the same press releases from
> Adam Schiff and the Democrats.

> Nothing even remotely close to that ever occurred. The Republican
> cross-examination forced every single witness to admit that there
> was no evidence for a "quid pro quo" of any kind. It's a total
> fabrication and fantasy.

> You should be aware that everything you've heard about the
> impeachment hearings is completely wrong, because everything
> you've heard is Adam Schiff talking points, provided by the
> Democrats. That's all the mainstream media quotes. If you want
> to hear the other side, a good source is Hannity at 9pm ET on Fox.

> The star witness, Gordon Sondland, originally said that there was
> no qpq [quid pro quo] in the bunker hearings. Then he changed his
> testimony in public to say that there was a qpq. Then under
> cross-examination in the public hearing, he was forced to admit
> there there was no evidence of a qpq.

> Why did he change his testimony? Because his family was being
> threatened with violence and his businesses were the targets of
> riots and demonstrations. These threats and riots were being
> organized by Democrats to force Sondland to change his testimony.
> And it worked, because he was forced to change his testimony, to
> keep his family from being killed or his businesses from being
> destroyed. Even so, under Republican cross-examination, he was
> forced to go back to his original position.

> These threats of violence on Sondland's family and businesses are
> being led by Adam Schiff, who has lied and manufactured evidence
> dozens of times in the last three years. He is the worst piece of
> lying garbage on the scene today -- which is saying something,
> because there's a lot of garbage today on the scene in Washington.
> And it says a lot that the Democrats are being led by this
> worthless peace of garbage. It says a lot about them."

It came out in news reports later that the violence against Sondland
was incited by Oregon Democrat Rep. Earl Blumenauer. Perhaps he
was encouraged by the Democrat party witch, Maxine Waters, who has
repeatedly incited violence against Republicans.

Later, Jonathan Turley's family was also threatened with violence by
Democrats when he testified that the impeachment couldn't be
justified.

So the whole Ukraine impeachment circus was a lie and a hoax. It
joins other events that turned out to be hoaxes -- the Gov Whitmer
kidnapping hoax and the insurrection hoax. Both of those hoaxes were
staged with the help of FBI agents who infiltrated and entrapped the
Trump supporters by encouraging them or even planning with them.

So those are three hoaxes staged under the direction of Nancy Pelosi
and Adam Schiff. That makes a grand slam.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by John J. Xenakis - 08-26-2021, 05:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,835 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,413 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,703 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,309 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,345 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 55 Guest(s)