11-24-2021, 11:05 PM
*** 25-Nov-21 World View -- Ahmaud Arberry verdict and the KKK Democrats
This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
****
**** Overwhelmingly white jury finds three white defendants guilty of murdering black Arberry
****
![[Image: g211124b.jpg]](http://Media.GenerationalDynamics.com/ww2010/g211124b.jpg)
Black murder victim Ahmaud Arberry and three convicted white murderers (Getty, toofab.com)
Despite the hysteria and threats of violence from the left-wing loons
on CNN and MSNBC, a jury of 11 white people and one black person
convicted three white defendants of murder of a black person, Ahmaud
Arberry.
The leftist loons claimed that white jurors only vote in a racist,
bigoted way, but instead they examined the evidence, and the evidence
was overwhelming that Ahmaud Arberry had been murdered.
So the court system worked correctly.
****
**** The return of the Democrat KKK
****
It was pretty clear that the Democrat KKK attitudes and hatred of
blacks were still in place during the Arberry trial.
A defense attorney stood up and asked for black pastors to be banned
from the courtroom. A Southern judge last century would probably have
granted that request, but today, the request is idiotic. Today, it
takes a Democrat attorney steeped in KKK hatred to try it.
Also, in closing arguments, the defense tried to appeal to the white
jurors by saying that Arberry was no victim, and that he was in the
neighborhood with "dirty khakis with no socks to cover his long dirty
toenails." This would certainly have worked with the Democrats in the
KKK in the last century, and would probably also have worked with many
Democrats steeped in KKK hatreds today, but instead it appears to have
badly backfired, even among the white Democrats on the jury.
These acts by the defense attorneys were typical of the KKK in the
last century, and they would have worked. They're less common today
because they frequently backfire, even among many Democrats. But it's
clear that racism and hatred of blacks still runs deep in the Democrat
party. This dates back to the Civil War, and the fury that Democrats
felt that the Republicans under Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and
won the war, causing the Democrats to create the KKK and the Jim Crow
laws, and spend the next century lynching and killing blacks, and
frequently using the epithet, "The South Shall Rise Again!"
In fact, Joe Biden grew up in that hate-filled atmosphere, with a
mentor of Democrat Party scion Robert Byrd, who was a Grand Cyclops in
the KKK and a recruiter for the KKK. If Joe Biden had been on the
Arberry jury, he might well have found the defendants innocent.
Robert Byrd would almost certainly have done so.
It's impossible to overstate what's going on - almost a resurgence of
the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) in the Democrat party. You have thousands of
blacks being killed in the streets of Chicago, LA, San Francisco,
Baltimore, and other cities run by Democrats. Killing blacks is just
as much the policy of Democrats today as it was in the last century.
That's not true of all Democrats, just as it wasn't true of all
Democrats in the last century, but it is true of a large segment of
the Democrat party today. And, unfortunately, that segment of the
Democrat party is now the loony left that is running the Democrat
party, and they appear to want to re-fight the Civil War, in the hope
of winning it this time and re-enslaving the blacks.
****
**** Kyle Rittenhouse and George Floyd
****
The evidence was overwhelming that Kyle Rittenhouse had fired only in
self defense, and so he was found innocent. So the court system
worked correctly.
Derek Chauvin was found guilty last year of murdering George Floyd.
So the court system worked correctly.
These are two more examples of how the court and jury system worked
correctly, so it makes no sense for the people on the loony left to
want to destroy the American court system by packing the Supreme Court
and by making every case about racial justice.
****
**** CNN commentary
****
On CNN, the Arberry commentary focused on the dog whistles and racial
baiting that we described earlier to get the white people in the jury
not to convict.
CNN commentary on the Rittenhouse verdict was apoplectic.
I saw the Jim Acosta show on CNN shortly after the Rittenhouse
verdict. Recall that Acosta made a jackass of himself every day
during the Trump administration by screaming stupid questions and
epithets at Trump during press conferences, but being a jackass only
made him a hero to the loony left, and made him a star at CNN.
The contrast between Fox News and CNN was enormous. Analysts on Fox
News almost universally said that finding Rittenhouse not guilty was
the correct verdict, based on the overwhelming evidence. But they
contrasted that to the event, which they said was a tragedy because
two people had been killed, and they said that Rittenhouse was not a
hero.
But Acosta was unable to distinguish between those two things --
finding innocence and not being a hero. What I've found is that many
people in general are unable to do fourth grade math or even second
grade math, to the extent of being baffled by fourth grade percentage
problems. AOC is a prime example of this, as she showed her stupidity
in that issue over the Amazon HQ issue in 2019. AOC is one of the
stupidest people in Washington, and the only people who are stupider
than she is are her millions of followers in the Democrat party.
It takes a certain grasp of logic to be able to do fourth grade math,
and people who can't do fourth grade math should not be expected to
distinguish between seeing Rittenhouse as not guilty and Rittenhouse
as some kind of hero. Even worse, you have to be really stupid not to
understand that a case where a white man shoots three white men is not
a racial issue. Acosta is clearly that stupid. CNN attracts
commentators who are too stupid to do fourth grade math. From what
I've seen, Fox News attracts commentators who are intelligent enough
to do fourth grade math.
CNN headquarters is in Atlanta, where the Arberry trial was held.
Atlanta is a hotbed of Democrat racists and idiots, which makes it the
perfect location for CNN. Nonetheless, the brilliant American jury
system, which is the best in the world and in the history of the
world, came to the correct verdict.
****
**** Loony left comments on the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict
****
Anyone who watched the Kyle Rittenhouse trial could see that the
innocence verdict was justified, but left-wing Democrat politicians
and journalists became hysterical, and called for the virtual
detruction of the American jury system. Many of the claims made in
the following quotes were lies, made by people who knew they were
lies, but who didn't care:
Mayor Bill de Blasio: "This verdict is disgusting and it sends a
horrible message to this country. Where is the justice in this? We
can't let this go. We need stronger laws to stop violent extremism
from within our own nation. Now is the time."
Joy Reid, MSNBC: We knew, but it’s sometimes helpful to remind
ourselves how America was designed to work. It continues to work as
designed. We have learned again what is considered legal for *some*
people to do in America. It’s helpful to know where you stand in your
country. Be safe out there.
Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes: "Over the last few weeks, many
dreaded the outcome we just witnessed. The presumption of innocence
until proven guilty is what we should expect from our judicial system,
but that standard is not always applied equally. We have seen so many
black and brown youth killed, only to be put on trial posthumously,
while the innocence of Kyle Rittenhouse was virtually demanded by the
judge."
NY Governor Kathy Hochul: "Kyle Rittenhouse used an assault weapon to
kill two people. This is not justice. If there was any question about
why we need strong gun safety laws, this is your answer. This should
never have been allowed to happen in the first place. We have a lot of
work to do."
Reverend Al Sharpton: "These continue to be dark days for black people
killed at the hands of people that believe our lives do not
matter. This verdict was not only outrageous and dangerous, it was
also an obvious signal that encourages and notifies "vigilantes" that
they can continue to use violence to assert their power, and more
importantly that they are above the criminal justice system when they
do. While it is disheartening that we take one step forward, then
several steps back, let this be a reminder that our activism cannot
take a backseat"
Eric Adams, NYC Mayor-elect: "This decision is an indictment of
irresponsible laws that make our society far more violent and unsafe
under the guise of personal freedom and so called self-defense. It
also sends an extremely dangerous message to those in our country who
seek agendas of anarchy - often born in prejudice and ignorance - to
wreak havoc in their communities and potentially murder their
neighbors. We should not be shocked. We should be focused on swift and
righteous action."
Jumaane Williams, NYC Public Advocate: "This trial and the verdict it
produced are clear and devastating representations of the way our
country and our legal system view innocence and guilt, vigilantes and
villains, race and the fight against racial injustice. A white
seventeen year old killing protesters with a weapon of war is
celebrated and acquitted. A black seventeen year old walking the
community with a bag of Skittles is criminalized and murdered.
Rep. Jerry Nadler: "This heartbreaking verdict is a miscarriage of
justice and sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review
by DOJ. Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines
looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected
protest."
Nikole Hannah-Jones, NY Times: "In this country, you can even kill
white people and get away with it if those white people are fighting
for Black lives. This is the legacy of 1619."
George Takei, former Star Trek actor: "Justice denied is a body blow
to our national psyche. On trial was not only a killer, but a system
that continues to kill. Today that system defeated true justice, once
again. But mark these words: We will never stop fighting for what is
right and just."
****
**** Darryl Brooks
****
In the midst of all this, Darryl E. Brooks, a black male in late 30s,
killed six people and injured 60 others by running them over
intentionally with a car as they marched in the Christmas Parade in
Waukesha, Wisconsin, on Sunday.
![[Image: g211124c.jpg]](http://Media.GenerationalDynamics.com/ww2010/g211124c.jpg)
Screen shot from video, just before Brooks' red SUV plows into parade marchers
Brooks had previously been out on bail after pimping out a 16 year old
girl who got pregnant, and for attempting to kill the mother of his
baby by running her over with his car, and almost succeeding in
killing her, and after numerous other felonies, dating back to 1999.
He was out on bail because of a "woke" District Attorney who was
following "woke" policies of not jailing convicted criminals. Brooks
was let out of jail, and he repeated the crime of killing people by
running over with this car, this time succeeding spectacularly.
Examination of Darryl Brooks's media posts shows him to be a man
filled with hatred for whites and women.
![[Image: g211124d.jpg]](http://Media.GenerationalDynamics.com/ww2010/g211124d.jpg)
Darryl Brooks tweet: 'The old white ppl ... knock dem TF out!'
This reminds me of the e-mail messages found on Hunter Biden's laptop,
which showed similar hatred of blacks. Like father, like son.
Not surprisingly, CNN did not mention the Darryl Brooks case.
****
**** Lessons learned
****
The main lesson learned from all of these cases is that the brilliant
American jury system works. As everyone points out, there are reforms
to be made. In this case, there were many complaints about
prosecuters in both the Arberry and Rittenhouse cases. But the
American jury system, at its core, is the best for determining guilt
or innocense.
Another lesson to be learned is that racial hysteria doesn't always
work, and shouldn't work. Race hysteria was raised in all the cases
I've mentioned, and in the end, race didn't matter in any of them.
A third lesson to be learned is the importance of video evidence.
This is a relatively new development in jury trials, and it fits in
well with the American jury system, since it provides a new and very
powerful means for juries to assess what happened.
The fourth lesson is that racism and hatred of blacks still runs deep
in the Democrat party. Unfortunately, this is evident in the policies
of Joe Biden and the Democrat party leadership. This is evident in
policies that lead to the deaths of thousands of blacks in
Democrat-run cities, and it's also evident in the drive for "Critical
Race Theory," whose purpose if to victimize and marginalize blacks, as
was done in the last century by the KKK and the Jim Crow Laws.
So we would have to agree that there's a lot of work to be done to
cure systemic racism, but that work has to be done almost exclusively
within the Democrat party, especially its leadership.
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!
Sources:
Related Articles:
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Ahmaud Arberry, Kyle Rittenhouse,
George Floyd, Darryl Brooks, CNN, Jim Acosta
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal
John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 2-03C
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
- Overwhelmingly white jury finds three white defendants guilty of murdering black Arberry
- The return of the Democrat KKK
- Kyle Rittenhouse and George Floyd
- CNN commentary
- Loony left comments on the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict
- Darryl Brooks
- Lessons learned
****
**** Overwhelmingly white jury finds three white defendants guilty of murdering black Arberry
****
Black murder victim Ahmaud Arberry and three convicted white murderers (Getty, toofab.com)
Despite the hysteria and threats of violence from the left-wing loons
on CNN and MSNBC, a jury of 11 white people and one black person
convicted three white defendants of murder of a black person, Ahmaud
Arberry.
The leftist loons claimed that white jurors only vote in a racist,
bigoted way, but instead they examined the evidence, and the evidence
was overwhelming that Ahmaud Arberry had been murdered.
So the court system worked correctly.
****
**** The return of the Democrat KKK
****
It was pretty clear that the Democrat KKK attitudes and hatred of
blacks were still in place during the Arberry trial.
A defense attorney stood up and asked for black pastors to be banned
from the courtroom. A Southern judge last century would probably have
granted that request, but today, the request is idiotic. Today, it
takes a Democrat attorney steeped in KKK hatred to try it.
Also, in closing arguments, the defense tried to appeal to the white
jurors by saying that Arberry was no victim, and that he was in the
neighborhood with "dirty khakis with no socks to cover his long dirty
toenails." This would certainly have worked with the Democrats in the
KKK in the last century, and would probably also have worked with many
Democrats steeped in KKK hatreds today, but instead it appears to have
badly backfired, even among the white Democrats on the jury.
These acts by the defense attorneys were typical of the KKK in the
last century, and they would have worked. They're less common today
because they frequently backfire, even among many Democrats. But it's
clear that racism and hatred of blacks still runs deep in the Democrat
party. This dates back to the Civil War, and the fury that Democrats
felt that the Republicans under Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and
won the war, causing the Democrats to create the KKK and the Jim Crow
laws, and spend the next century lynching and killing blacks, and
frequently using the epithet, "The South Shall Rise Again!"
In fact, Joe Biden grew up in that hate-filled atmosphere, with a
mentor of Democrat Party scion Robert Byrd, who was a Grand Cyclops in
the KKK and a recruiter for the KKK. If Joe Biden had been on the
Arberry jury, he might well have found the defendants innocent.
Robert Byrd would almost certainly have done so.
It's impossible to overstate what's going on - almost a resurgence of
the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) in the Democrat party. You have thousands of
blacks being killed in the streets of Chicago, LA, San Francisco,
Baltimore, and other cities run by Democrats. Killing blacks is just
as much the policy of Democrats today as it was in the last century.
That's not true of all Democrats, just as it wasn't true of all
Democrats in the last century, but it is true of a large segment of
the Democrat party today. And, unfortunately, that segment of the
Democrat party is now the loony left that is running the Democrat
party, and they appear to want to re-fight the Civil War, in the hope
of winning it this time and re-enslaving the blacks.
****
**** Kyle Rittenhouse and George Floyd
****
The evidence was overwhelming that Kyle Rittenhouse had fired only in
self defense, and so he was found innocent. So the court system
worked correctly.
Derek Chauvin was found guilty last year of murdering George Floyd.
So the court system worked correctly.
These are two more examples of how the court and jury system worked
correctly, so it makes no sense for the people on the loony left to
want to destroy the American court system by packing the Supreme Court
and by making every case about racial justice.
****
**** CNN commentary
****
On CNN, the Arberry commentary focused on the dog whistles and racial
baiting that we described earlier to get the white people in the jury
not to convict.
CNN commentary on the Rittenhouse verdict was apoplectic.
I saw the Jim Acosta show on CNN shortly after the Rittenhouse
verdict. Recall that Acosta made a jackass of himself every day
during the Trump administration by screaming stupid questions and
epithets at Trump during press conferences, but being a jackass only
made him a hero to the loony left, and made him a star at CNN.
The contrast between Fox News and CNN was enormous. Analysts on Fox
News almost universally said that finding Rittenhouse not guilty was
the correct verdict, based on the overwhelming evidence. But they
contrasted that to the event, which they said was a tragedy because
two people had been killed, and they said that Rittenhouse was not a
hero.
But Acosta was unable to distinguish between those two things --
finding innocence and not being a hero. What I've found is that many
people in general are unable to do fourth grade math or even second
grade math, to the extent of being baffled by fourth grade percentage
problems. AOC is a prime example of this, as she showed her stupidity
in that issue over the Amazon HQ issue in 2019. AOC is one of the
stupidest people in Washington, and the only people who are stupider
than she is are her millions of followers in the Democrat party.
It takes a certain grasp of logic to be able to do fourth grade math,
and people who can't do fourth grade math should not be expected to
distinguish between seeing Rittenhouse as not guilty and Rittenhouse
as some kind of hero. Even worse, you have to be really stupid not to
understand that a case where a white man shoots three white men is not
a racial issue. Acosta is clearly that stupid. CNN attracts
commentators who are too stupid to do fourth grade math. From what
I've seen, Fox News attracts commentators who are intelligent enough
to do fourth grade math.
CNN headquarters is in Atlanta, where the Arberry trial was held.
Atlanta is a hotbed of Democrat racists and idiots, which makes it the
perfect location for CNN. Nonetheless, the brilliant American jury
system, which is the best in the world and in the history of the
world, came to the correct verdict.
****
**** Loony left comments on the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict
****
Anyone who watched the Kyle Rittenhouse trial could see that the
innocence verdict was justified, but left-wing Democrat politicians
and journalists became hysterical, and called for the virtual
detruction of the American jury system. Many of the claims made in
the following quotes were lies, made by people who knew they were
lies, but who didn't care:
Mayor Bill de Blasio: "This verdict is disgusting and it sends a
horrible message to this country. Where is the justice in this? We
can't let this go. We need stronger laws to stop violent extremism
from within our own nation. Now is the time."
Joy Reid, MSNBC: We knew, but it’s sometimes helpful to remind
ourselves how America was designed to work. It continues to work as
designed. We have learned again what is considered legal for *some*
people to do in America. It’s helpful to know where you stand in your
country. Be safe out there.
Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes: "Over the last few weeks, many
dreaded the outcome we just witnessed. The presumption of innocence
until proven guilty is what we should expect from our judicial system,
but that standard is not always applied equally. We have seen so many
black and brown youth killed, only to be put on trial posthumously,
while the innocence of Kyle Rittenhouse was virtually demanded by the
judge."
NY Governor Kathy Hochul: "Kyle Rittenhouse used an assault weapon to
kill two people. This is not justice. If there was any question about
why we need strong gun safety laws, this is your answer. This should
never have been allowed to happen in the first place. We have a lot of
work to do."
Reverend Al Sharpton: "These continue to be dark days for black people
killed at the hands of people that believe our lives do not
matter. This verdict was not only outrageous and dangerous, it was
also an obvious signal that encourages and notifies "vigilantes" that
they can continue to use violence to assert their power, and more
importantly that they are above the criminal justice system when they
do. While it is disheartening that we take one step forward, then
several steps back, let this be a reminder that our activism cannot
take a backseat"
Eric Adams, NYC Mayor-elect: "This decision is an indictment of
irresponsible laws that make our society far more violent and unsafe
under the guise of personal freedom and so called self-defense. It
also sends an extremely dangerous message to those in our country who
seek agendas of anarchy - often born in prejudice and ignorance - to
wreak havoc in their communities and potentially murder their
neighbors. We should not be shocked. We should be focused on swift and
righteous action."
Jumaane Williams, NYC Public Advocate: "This trial and the verdict it
produced are clear and devastating representations of the way our
country and our legal system view innocence and guilt, vigilantes and
villains, race and the fight against racial injustice. A white
seventeen year old killing protesters with a weapon of war is
celebrated and acquitted. A black seventeen year old walking the
community with a bag of Skittles is criminalized and murdered.
Rep. Jerry Nadler: "This heartbreaking verdict is a miscarriage of
justice and sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review
by DOJ. Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines
looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected
protest."
Nikole Hannah-Jones, NY Times: "In this country, you can even kill
white people and get away with it if those white people are fighting
for Black lives. This is the legacy of 1619."
George Takei, former Star Trek actor: "Justice denied is a body blow
to our national psyche. On trial was not only a killer, but a system
that continues to kill. Today that system defeated true justice, once
again. But mark these words: We will never stop fighting for what is
right and just."
****
**** Darryl Brooks
****
In the midst of all this, Darryl E. Brooks, a black male in late 30s,
killed six people and injured 60 others by running them over
intentionally with a car as they marched in the Christmas Parade in
Waukesha, Wisconsin, on Sunday.
Screen shot from video, just before Brooks' red SUV plows into parade marchers
Brooks had previously been out on bail after pimping out a 16 year old
girl who got pregnant, and for attempting to kill the mother of his
baby by running her over with his car, and almost succeeding in
killing her, and after numerous other felonies, dating back to 1999.
He was out on bail because of a "woke" District Attorney who was
following "woke" policies of not jailing convicted criminals. Brooks
was let out of jail, and he repeated the crime of killing people by
running over with this car, this time succeeding spectacularly.
Examination of Darryl Brooks's media posts shows him to be a man
filled with hatred for whites and women.
Darryl Brooks tweet: 'The old white ppl ... knock dem TF out!'
This reminds me of the e-mail messages found on Hunter Biden's laptop,
which showed similar hatred of blacks. Like father, like son.
Not surprisingly, CNN did not mention the Darryl Brooks case.
****
**** Lessons learned
****
The main lesson learned from all of these cases is that the brilliant
American jury system works. As everyone points out, there are reforms
to be made. In this case, there were many complaints about
prosecuters in both the Arberry and Rittenhouse cases. But the
American jury system, at its core, is the best for determining guilt
or innocense.
Another lesson to be learned is that racial hysteria doesn't always
work, and shouldn't work. Race hysteria was raised in all the cases
I've mentioned, and in the end, race didn't matter in any of them.
A third lesson to be learned is the importance of video evidence.
This is a relatively new development in jury trials, and it fits in
well with the American jury system, since it provides a new and very
powerful means for juries to assess what happened.
The fourth lesson is that racism and hatred of blacks still runs deep
in the Democrat party. Unfortunately, this is evident in the policies
of Joe Biden and the Democrat party leadership. This is evident in
policies that lead to the deaths of thousands of blacks in
Democrat-run cities, and it's also evident in the drive for "Critical
Race Theory," whose purpose if to victimize and marginalize blacks, as
was done in the last century by the KKK and the Jim Crow Laws.
So we would have to agree that there's a lot of work to be done to
cure systemic racism, but that work has to be done almost exclusively
within the Democrat party, especially its leadership.
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!
Sources:
- Jurors saw through the preposterous defense by Ahmaud Arbery's killers (CNN, 24-Nov-2021)
- EXCLUSIVE: 'The old white ppl ... knock dem TF out!' Waukesha suspect shared social media posts promoting violence towards white people and claiming black people were the 'true Hebrews' (Daily Mail, 23-Nov-2021)
- Reaction to the verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, found not (ABC News, 19-Nov-2021)
- 'Absolutely no words': Gabrielle Union, Megyn Kelly, more celebs react to Kyle Rittenhouse verdict (USA Today, 19-Nov-2021)
Related Articles:
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Ahmaud Arberry, Kyle Rittenhouse,
George Floyd, Darryl Brooks, CNN, Jim Acosta
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal
John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 2-03C
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
