04-25-2019, 01:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-25-2019, 01:41 AM by Eric the Green.)
(04-20-2019, 11:23 PM)Marypoza Wrote:(04-20-2019, 04:10 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: The horoscope scores tell who can win, based on aspects in the charts of all the candidates in USA history. The higher the proportion of the score based on the aspects in their horoscope, the greater their chance to win. Only 3 candidates with barely-negative scores have won the US presidency in 230 years, and none since 1904. Those with the best scores are actually the ones who can appeal to American voters and impress them as a strong and likable leader. The best Democratic candidates have not announced, and some of the worst-scoring are now more popular. Fair warning! Estimated scores so far (subject to minor changes):
Republicans:
Donald Trump 9-4
William Weld 8-13
Democrats:
Mitch Landrieu 16-2
Terry McAuliffe 11-2
Sherrod Brown 19-8
Bernie Sanders 14-7
Joe Biden 14-7
Wayne Messam 15-8
Stacey Abrams 13-7
Tulsi Gabbard 11-6
John Delaney 7-5
Elizabeth Warren 8-7
Amy Klobuchar 7-7
Marianne Williamson 13-14
Pete Buttigieg 7-8
Cory Booker, 6-7
Eric Swalwell 4-6
Julian Castro 8-13
Kirsten Gillbrand, 7-13
Andrew Yang 8-15
Mike Gravel, 5-10
Howard Schultz 9-18
Jay Inslee 3-7
Beto O'Rourke 11-26
Tim Ryan 3-12
Kamala Harris 4-16
http://philosopherswheel.com/presidentialelections.html
-- you knocked the Donald down 6 pts wuzzup?
Ps my homeboy Sherrod ain't running
Yes, unfortunately, and so with Landrieu and McAuliffe. So Bernie and Biden are at the top of the Democratic pack.
As I have often mentioned, I revised the scores during the 2016 election, due to further thorough refinements in my research. Except for minor changes if I find out birth times, or corrections to mistakes I have made in my counts for new candidates, the scores have been set now since Dec. 2016. After the 2020 elections, there could be further minor changes. Probably no-one will have their scores changed by six points again though.