Election 2020

[Eric the Green]

(11-08-2019, 08:11 AM)Hintergrund Wrote: LOL, astrological analysis of politicians.

That's the secret formula

And I made a correction to the score for Michael Bennet; he now has a negative score of 8-9. So he may drop out soon. Of course the critics of astrology ignore that, when well applied, astrology makes correct predictions. The proof is in the pudding, not in outdated scientism worldviews. So far, for example, ALL the candidates who have dropped out have negative scores.

So, who will be the next to drop out? Will it be Bennet? Of course Sestak and Messam are already off the radar. But those who are consistently failing to make it to the debate stage will consider dropping out. And Booker already said that he might.  Williamson is in it to be the new age candidate and make points, so she won't drop out for a while, I don't think.

And who will be the first candidate with a positive score to drop out? Steve Bullock isn't catching on very well, so it might be him. Delaney might be too determined to drop out.

Meanwhile, Michael Bloomberg is talking about running in the Alabama primary. He has a positive score, but only 7-5. He is not any better, and in fact not as good as Biden and Sanders, and just as old too. So he isn't the savior that he claims to be. We don't need a billionaire centrist to save us by spending lots of money. And since this primary has virtually no significance, and since CA is coming up soon, if he's not in that one it will be too late.

Pete Buttigieg is doing well, but his barely-negative score indicates that he will not be the gay Obama (19-2), and that he will not win in Iowa and catapult into the lead. And being a mid-sized town mayor is not a high enough platform to run on. But he is getting lots of money, though Bernie Sanders leads the pack in that regard.