10-21-2020, 01:43 PM
One of the internet opinion pieces covering the election proposed that Trump is going to lose any given challenge to the election results. There is apparently a legal doctrine that you cannot benefit from breaking the law. Thus, for example, if you kill a witness, anything he said would be admitted as evidence, including heresy. The killer would lose his right to confront his accuser and significant rights to throw out evidence.
Trump is clearly guilty of rigging the election. Any benefit to Trump that involves a rigged unfair election runs into that principle. The lawyer predicted any suit involving the impure election ought to be rejected out of hand.
The guy presenting this principle was fond of saying that judges were no dummies. He did not imply that Trump was.
We will see if this holds true.
Trump is clearly guilty of rigging the election. Any benefit to Trump that involves a rigged unfair election runs into that principle. The lawyer predicted any suit involving the impure election ought to be rejected out of hand.
The guy presenting this principle was fond of saying that judges were no dummies. He did not imply that Trump was.
We will see if this holds true.
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.