10-28-2020, 03:48 PM
Donald Trump cannot win fair and square. He has likely been so told, but he may order people to make sure that he wins. That is what Amy Coney Barrett is for -- to seal any decision that ensures that America become a fascist dictatorship.
Polling data suggest that Trump has no meaningful chance to win:
![[Image: IH2O6SARYNH55E5T2JECFX4QZY.jpg&w=691]](https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/IH2O6SARYNH55E5T2JECFX4QZY.jpg&w=691)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...es-months/
Trump has likely never been ahead in any poll average in any state that he lost in 2016 (which explains why he is not shown for such states as California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, or Washington). He loses Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin unless he can do at the end of a sordid campaign what he never did at any other time but that he won in 2016. That's before I discuss Georgia or Iowa, where late polls have gone against Trump.
People have been watching the polls heavily, and it is hard for anyone to believe that Trump can win unless he can unilaterally disqualify the votes by which he loses. Many people, like I, trust mathematical (including statistical) rules far more than they trust the utterances of a President who alternates between word salad (which Amy Coney Barrett so generously dished out in her confirmation hearing) or outright Newspeak.
I hate this President. In the unlikely case that he gets re-elected, I wish I could emigrate.
Polling data suggest that Trump has no meaningful chance to win:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...es-months/
Trump has likely never been ahead in any poll average in any state that he lost in 2016 (which explains why he is not shown for such states as California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, or Washington). He loses Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin unless he can do at the end of a sordid campaign what he never did at any other time but that he won in 2016. That's before I discuss Georgia or Iowa, where late polls have gone against Trump.
People have been watching the polls heavily, and it is hard for anyone to believe that Trump can win unless he can unilaterally disqualify the votes by which he loses. Many people, like I, trust mathematical (including statistical) rules far more than they trust the utterances of a President who alternates between word salad (which Amy Coney Barrett so generously dished out in her confirmation hearing) or outright Newspeak.
I hate this President. In the unlikely case that he gets re-elected, I wish I could emigrate.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.