(12-12-2020, 01:03 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:(12-11-2020, 03:01 PM)CH86 Wrote: I Will Post my thoughts on this election here: First Biden Won the election but demanding that Trumpers disband shows that the DNC does not understand the existing situation. Dems were able to get Biden over the hurdle ONLY because of the COVID crisis started which allowed for an Anti-Trump campaign to be launched due to poor handling, well as the fact that may registered democrats and even some moderate republicans actually want Biden to govern as a moderate. However the above is Definitely NOT the goal of the DNC.
The DNC leaders and the DNC supporters (A strange alliance of Finance classes, 60s radical Liberal activists and their kids and Rural Southern Church Blacks) clearly don't value Biden as a president and clearly secretly see him as a obstacle to their plans. Sometime, probably in late 2022 or 2023 the DNC will betray Biden and try to Install Kamala as president, however Kamala's backers mentioned above would get into a world of hurt if they do so. Actual Moderates and Progressives only voted for Biden because they wanted an actual moderate (in the case of the moderates) or they disliked Trump (in the case of the progressives). They did NOT vote because they support the DNC goals or the DNC/SJW alliance. When Pelosi and Kamala try to 25th amendment Biden, you will see an alliance of everyone not aligned with the DNC form. It will essentially be all parties (Democrats, Republicans and independents) vs about 30% of the democrats.
Classic is only incorrect in that he sees a purely GOP base movement leading the struggle against the DNC. Eric, Pbrower and B Butler Saying that democrats outnumber Trumps post-election diehards is only technically correct, and barely so. It is correct only based on the current alignments of november/december 2020 that exist as we currently speak. But the Great Realignment I speak of is relevant for 2022-2023, said realignment hasn't taken place yet. Moderates, Progressives, and Anti-Trump republicans have no reason to remain allied with Liberals if Trump leaves. The Only reason Kamala is part of the ticket is because the 60s radicals and church blacks threatened not to vote for their own nominee if she wasn't on the ticket.
If it comes to a national plebiscite on "do you want Kamala Harris to replace Joe Biden" there will be an overwhelming vote of NO, with only a string of Rural cotton belt Counties voting YES. America would be reunited and realigned at that Moment with the NO vote. We will not allow boomers to Turn the entire Country into South Carolina DNC politics in order to preserve their corrupt grip on power. Think of it Trumpers, Berners, Moderates, Independents, Latinos, Northern and western Blacks, Asians, Indians and Arabs standing together to fight for the right to be REAL men and REAL women: To stop the globalist feminization of our children by Financial tycoons, Wrinkled Boomers and Wrinkled and Fat church ladies. It will be Glorious.
After the Defeat and political elimination of the DNC/Kamala Cult, Moderates, Conservatives, Progressives and Independents will have long and heated discussions over sensible policy options. With the Boomers and SJWs defeated, these discussions while heated will result in sensible compromise as all parties would be keenly aware of each others interests. The Synthesis of these discussions would be implemented as policy. The Military would be rebuilt, Industry would be rebuilt, Native and nationalized tech capacity would be rebuilt. We will move against Iran (depending on what their countries leaders do then it will either be Peace or War) without having our hands tied by Boomers and NGOs. Will will Contain China, while building our Nuke Arsenal to 100,000 warheads.
Us Boomers will win, with our Millennial and Gen Z allies. We will feminize the whole human race, turning us all into girls (by your definition, of course). After all, we are all children of Mother Earth, and saving Her is uppermost. That's why we need to be globalists too, and why we need no more nationalists like you CH. We will take away your guns, too. We will stop your authoritarian paternalist fascism before it even starts. Archie Bunker will not win. "Girls were girls and men were men" is for the old days. Your day was defeated in 1945, never to rise again.
Astrology speaks. It is the voice of the cosmos around us, and of Mother Earth. It says Kamala will never be president, and not ever get nominated either, so you will have no excuse to base your victory upon her defeat. She was chosen VP by mistake, and her gender and race played a role in that mistake; but as a candidate she never even had the support of the "church blacks" or very many Democrats of any stripe. She is a capable administrator, so she will contribute to a successful Biden administration. However, since she sucks as a candidate, she will never win or even inherit the USA presidency. Candidates with a 3-17 score do not win USA presidential elections.
I'm glad to see Susan Rice (14-7) finally get a position. Biden was afraid of the Republicans harranging her over her non-existent Benghazi BooBoo. But having domestic policy experience will put another feather in her cap. If the Democrats want a black woman, Susan is articulate and poised and would make a good presidential candidate instead of Harris, who is neither.
Elections from 1932 to 2020:
1932: Franklin D Roosevelt (FDR) 21-5 U, Herbert Hoover 11-14*
1936: Franklin D Roosevelt 21-5 U, Alf Landon 11-15
1940: Franklin D Roosevelt 21-5 U*, Wendell Wilkie 10-10
1944: Franklin D Roosevelt 21-5 U, Thomas Dewey 9-7 SN
1948: Harry Truman 15-0, Thomas Dewey 9-7 SN
1952: Dwight Eisenhower (Ike) 17-10, Adlai Stevenson 5-19
1956: Dwight Eisenhower 17-10, Adlai Stevenson 5-19*
1960: John F Kennedy (JFK) 13-4, Richard Nixon 19-6
1964: Lyndon B Johnson (LBJ) 9-6 J/M*, Barry Goldwater 21-10 M** (he had Mars in Scorpio rising, with inharmonious aspects: the perfect symbol of his stubborn "extremism")
1968: Richard Nixon 19-6*, Hubert Humphrey 12-5**, George Wallace 3-5 J/M
1972: Richard Nixon 19-6, George McGovern 9-11
1976: Jimmy Carter 13-5, Gerald Ford 13-7
1980: Ronald Reagan 23-3, M?, Jimmy Carter 13-5*, John Anderson 11-8 J*
1984: Ronald Reagan 23-3, M?, Walter Mondale 12-12 J/U*
1988: George H W Bush 15-5, Michael Dukakis 2-12*
1992: Bill Clinton 25-2 J/M, George H W Bush 15-5, Ross Perot 7-12 (his Jupiter rising is evident, but it was 10 degrees above his ascendant, so I didn't count it officially)
1996: Bill Clinton 25-2 J/M, Bob Dole 12-18, Ross Perot 7-12
2000: George W Bush 19-2*, Al Gore 11-10 M
2004: George W Bush 19-2, John Kerry 7-16
2008: Barack Obama 18-3, John McCain 13-12
2012: Barack Obama 18-3, Mitt Romney 4-10 U, SN
2016: Donald Trump 9-4 M, Hillary Rodham Clinton 7-12 J
2020: Joe Biden 16-6, Donald Trump 9-4 M (predicted as of Oct.15, 2020)
*Saturn Return blocks good fortune, and those who win anyway must face war and disaster
**Saturn Return before opponent's
J Jupiter rising helps a major-party candidate with a decent score to win, or at least improve his/her score
U Uranus rising, charisma
M Mars rising, aggressive
SN born with Saturn at the Nadir, averse to public status
http://philosopherswheel.com/presidentialelections.html
Except the DNC REALLY wants Harris to be president. She was at only 2 percent in the polls which is a pathetic showing, it is not surprising that analytical methods that try to peer into the spiritual realm would show the same results. But the DNC plans to install her through the backdoor. Democrat leaders showed themselves to be weaklings by picking her instead of the less controversial Susan Rice. Harris was picked because Clyburn told Joe to do so, and for no other reason.
Boomers will lose and this is especially so if you use your own astrology methods as various charts clearly indicate a regime change in the late 2020s/2030s after a series of weak leaders in the 2020s. See the inauguration charts from 2021 through 2037. A Weimar scenario where the government has questionable legitimacy allows for various new factions space to develop and organize as movement. We've seen this starting in Obama's second term and a bit more under Trump, now that Biden is in there and clearly propped up by boomer financial interests and ideological interest groups, the young will mobilize in favor of their own ideologies which are NOT in line with boomerism. Only Boomers like Biden, literally no one except SJWs liked harris. Most millennials despised the democrats choice and did not vote. You guys did succeed in swaying Gen-Z but only using fear and crisis propaganda. Trump on the other hand is supported by Xers mostly.
Millennials will NOT embrace peaceloving liberalism as it is our destiny the overthow the boomer tyranny of weaklings whose pathetic leadership made 9/11 possible in the first place. Iran will be brought to heel and not by utilizing NGO's against the regime, but by the ruthless annihilation of living forces. Such will destroy Islamism as well as it has now been proven the all major Islamist attacks were organized from halls of the mullahs in Tehran and Qom.