(02-02-2017, 01:26 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: Sherrod might be OK, but he doesn't speak as well. His voice is gravelly and not too enthusiastic. His score is barely superior to Trump by %, though his positive number is much higher. McAuliffe has a score clearly superior to Trump. I am quite impressed with his speaking and social abilities.
Traditional aspect indicators like "squares=bad and trines=good" do not work out in real life. Sometimes a candidate needs the feisty energy of a square or opposition to win. None of the squares in McAuliffe's grand square count against him, according to my figures on who won and who lost with each of those aspects. And several of them count in his favor, along with several others. His score would even go up if he was born early in the morning, because of additional favorable lunar aspects. Given the fact that the new moon before election favors the party in power to win the popular vote (barring the new factor of Uranus sq. the Ascendant which maybe upset the applecart for the first time in 2016 and will repeat in 2020), it will be essential for the Democratic candidate to have a positive score that easily beats Trump, without any Saturn Return in his future in office. McAuliffe may be the only politician with all that in his favor. Now, if Seth Meyers runs....
Both Brown and McAuliffe have a Jupiter-Uranus sextile, which could make them popular heroes like Trump is to his fans. Sherrod has the advantage that he might carry the Rust Belt with him, especially if the folks there feel Trump hasn't delivered what he promised for them.
-- l agree with you that squares & oppositions aren't neccessarily bad. They build backbone, creativity, resoucefulness, & character, among other things, in a person. A grand square otoh..... that can make for obstacles a little bit too rough to overcome completely. After l posted last it occurred to me that where there's a grand square there s/b a grand cross. & sho nuf.... actually he has a couple of those. And you wanna put him up against the Donald, who has grand trines in his chart? I think he has too many stress aspects in his chart. Gov may be as good as it gets for him. As for the Donald, grand trines (plural) can be too much of a good thing. It'll be interesting to see how he copes when shit hits the fan.. & it will.
As for 4*H, Uranus can be unpredictable. Popularity comes & goes. He gets no help from the Moon, which aspects neither of these planets, but is opposite Saturn
Post Sherrod's chart plz
my 2 yr old Niece/yr old Nephew 2020