12-11-2016, 04:12 PM
(12-11-2016, 04:08 PM)taramarie Wrote:(12-11-2016, 11:47 AM)Warren Dew Wrote:I meant the references provided in the link and no it is not just one persons "opinion" when they have used references. Please pay attention and look a the persons references before commenting. Wikipedia is fantastic for those references which are accurate.(12-11-2016, 04:16 AM)taramarie Wrote: "A strophic ballad, “One Tin Soldier” tells the tale of the materialistic “valley-people” who kill and cheat in search of a rumoured treasure on a mountain. The only treasure, though, is a stone inscribed with “Peace on earth”; ironically, the valley-people, a metaphor for mankind, destroyed this treasure whilst in the pursuit of it. The song ends with a repetition of the chorus which is a common arrangement technique used to engrain a song in the listener’s memory."
Now that is a blue hippie message if I ever saw one.
Look to the external links provided in this link of course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Original_Caste
There are no external links for that paragraph. Indeed, as an unsourced paragraph, it will probably be removed when someone notices, since it's just one Wikipedia editor's opinion.
There are no references at the link which are relevant to your quoted paragraph. That's why there are no footnotes in the paragraph. That means that the paragraph is pure opinion. Wikipedia is not so fantastic for its statements that have no footnotes/references.