04-04-2017, 01:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2017, 01:25 PM by Eric the Green.)
(04-04-2017, 01:29 AM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:(04-04-2017, 12:57 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: Mr. Colbert explains why Drump didn't throw out the first ball, and Drump explains why we didn't elect a woman president. And Stephen has fun with some rickrolling.
Eric $hillery was the WRONG woman, period. If Warren ran, I bet SHE'd won. Clinton = establishment. Like Ronnie Raygun said, "are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" If you're a working poor stiff like me, the answer is hell no! You know, I wish the Democratic party would clean house and purge all neoliberals from its ranks. It's time to get real. Qod, I wish that hag would just stay in the wood instead of rearing her canckles and leaving me with the feeling of ick. It's all intuition man. I go with intuition , every time. It's time the Democratic party assess why it lost, cast out the neoliberals and use Sander's positions as a template.
Obviously I agree about neo-liberals and Sanders' positions as a template.
But Rags thinks in black and red. I don't seem to agree that your exaggerated statements and sentiments are intuitive.
There is such a thing as gradation. I know the black and red world does not include this. 3T heavy metal rock does not include this. But it does exist; I assure you
Sanders was better than Hillary, and Hillary was 1000 times better than Drump. If Americans had made the right choice, we could have had a woman president. And she would have been a lot smarter, as Drump himself implied. Such was Colbert's point. And the proper response to Colbert's point, in my opinion, is not black and red exaggeration, but....
ha ha ha lol
(although, strictly speaking, he didn't say "Hillary," so it could have meant Warren....)