Presidential election, 2016

[Eric the Green]

(07-19-2016, 02:32 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote:

(07-19-2016, 12:04 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:

The record is clear....

Eric you are stretching it. Clearly you have not undergone good statistical training or if you did, you are not taking it to heart.

I didn't make the map.

Quote: What I would conclude from the chart would be:
1) JFK - LBJ: A continuation of the trend of the 1950s (with the exception of the early 60s minor glitch)
2) NIXON - FORD - CARTER - early Reagan: Suckiness

The map clearly shows that Carter was good and early Reagan bad; contrary to Repuglican propaganda.

Quote:3) Remainder Reagan - Bush 41 - Clinton: Roaring 20s redux

Reagan did do well for a while, apparently, after sucking big time; but of course we know that was a mirage; all the benefits went to the top. Then Bush 41 = suckiness.

Quote:4) Bush 43: The calm then the storm
5) Obama: Damage control

IOW, Bush 43 bad, Obama good. And Bush 43: more benefits only to the 1% during the "calm."

Quote:The above maps reasonably well to turnings, BTW.

So it would appear.
And to my predictions