07-20-2016, 10:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-21-2016, 03:38 PM by Eric the Green.)
(07-20-2016, 07:08 PM)John J. Xenakis Wrote:(07-20-2016, 01:26 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: > I suppose if you focus on some radical, extreme and doctrinaire
> feminists, or other particular such groups, you can find people
> who "tolerate no dissent" from their views, but that is not a
> "state religion" and most "secular humanists" are more open-minded
> than religious right people.
> Male and female equality is fair and necessary, just as is racial
> equality. These subjects should be no-brainers, and we should be
> long past controversy over them.
So, since you're not one of those radical, extreme and doctrinaire
feminists, then you must agree that a man like Bill Clinton who's been
credibly charged with rape by seven women, should face criminal
charges for rape in court?
I assume that's what you meant by your last comment.
Only one woman I know has charged Bill with rape. Even that one has never been brought into court. Just repeating lies, as Republicans do day and night, 24/7, does not make them true.
Quote:The 1990s started with feminists leading the charge at trashing
Clarence Thomas because he was a successful black man who married a
white women, which is something that I learned really infuriated women
in general, and feminists in particular. Then you had the whole thing
with Bill Clinton.
Another baldfaced lie. Clarence Thomas was charged by Anita Hill of sexual harassment. It was the central event of the 3T "culture wars." Did you miss something there, John? Thomas has also been "trashed" because he is the most empty-headed, reactionary fool ever to occupy the Supreme Court bench.