08-07-2016, 08:45 PM
(08-07-2016, 11:01 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:If that's true, why are Democrats still running on the same issue (income inequality) that they've been running on for decades. According to the Democrats, we are still as racist as we've ever been. If that's true, whatever social programs that were created and funded to address that issue isn't working. So, which Democratic view point is one supposed to believe now. Hillary's view point is that America for the most part peachy keen and that there's little for Americans to be concerned about at this time. Clinton didn't make 300 million working within the private sector. Clinton made 300 million while working in politics as a public servant. People who are OK with that really have nothing bad to talk about as far as the Republicans. Hillary may be viewed as greatest woman that exists to you and your values and whatever values that you've attached yourself to today. Dude, its people like me who are going to virtually wipe out the wise guys that you unknowingly represent. Why waste time screwing around with two pesky old birds when the time is coming and the natural changes are now taking place to take both of them out with one stone. In case you happen to be a liberal fool who still lives and breaths within the same old echo chamber and spends a lot time within the same old echo chamber, the Republican base has removed the politicians that it associated with bullshit. Logically speaking, rejected bullshit that no longer has a side will tend to drift to the side where bullshit still works. The political issue for the progressives are just beginning. The issue is the straight forwardness that will be becoming more and more prevalent on the right. Glitz and glamor, liberal child play and hippie (blue) values are the powers that pretty much rule your politics which is why I no longer pay attention to it or view it as being viable long term. Logically speaking, I expect as the nation moves deeper into crisis our politics will become more serious. The Republicans are ahead of the Democrats in that regard. I keep you on the ball. I love to f--k around with foolish liberals who view themselves on the ball.(08-07-2016, 10:18 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:(08-07-2016, 02:08 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: It's fine to strike a different note within our liberal echo chamber, Classic. I do think you are emotionally tied to some of the basic Republican ideas, however, but if you consider yourself untied, I'm on board with that; let's see where it leads you.I consider myself untied and free to roam politically. Plus, I don't live in an echo chamber or view myself as being associated with one. As you have seen, I'm quite capable of operating alone and messing up a liberal echo chamber with very limited support. To me, Bob is a liberal fool who doesn't realize that he lives in a echo chamber and actively participates within an echo chamber and receives the bulk of his knowledge and information from an echo chamber. Me, I prefer to get my knowledge and information first hand. To me, you're a fool. A fool supports a party and a candidate who is more interested in associating itself with Hollywood glamor and glitz, yuppies and techies and other upper end income sorts who represent the money that need for support of their political campaigns and social programs that they claim is being used to lift the poor.
The working class is diminishing, that's true, which means it's not a solid source of votes for either party. The Democrats have gone more techie and yuppie, as the economy shifts from drudgery to smarts. But the workers will vote liberal if they know what's good for them. Getting the wealthy to pay more taxes will help deal with the charity cases indeed, and what's more, help them to get out of poverty; whereas the trickle-down favor-the-powerful policies of the Republicans have diminished the middle class and expanded poverty for 35 years and counting. The conservative policies are those that have proven they can't hold up, as wealthy has been more and more concentrated due to their policies, while the middle class finds fewer opportunities.
Trump can pose as their champion and their voice, but he would lead them into the ditch so that his own class can continue to corner the market on power and wealth. That's what he's always done, and that's what he'll do despite his claims. And despite their claims, the favor-the-rich policies of the conservatives have never worked. Liberal mixed-economy policies always work, if administered properly, and not taken to extremes by a different leftist "communist" elite. But, that can't happen here, and never has.
Right; except what's got you fooled and confused, is that those social programs REALLY DO lift the poor! Kick in the head, ain't it? To realize that what you thought was the truth, growing up in Reagan meme land, really isn't? Or at least it WILL be a kick in the head, when and IF you finally DO realize it. Not that programs are the answer to everything, but in fact without them we are all in shit creek. And it's OUR candidates, not yours, who want to reform the system so that big money and glamour does not rule our politics. But little facts like that don't seem to bother you too much. You can continue to float along in YOUR echo chamber and sorta just let those little details go unnoticed. But that's OK; we need some fools like you around to help keep us wise guys on the ball
