01-09-2021, 12:25 PM
(01-09-2021, 10:36 AM)David Horn Wrote:(01-09-2021, 10:20 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote:(01-09-2021, 10:16 AM)David Horn Wrote: No one gets to threaten anyone (that I won't tolerate), but being outspoken isn't a reason for anything but a spirited response from someone else. That's the entire point of this place.
Even Classic isn't allowed to threaten? It is almost instinctive in him, and harmless in that he doesn't follow through.
I suppose...
I've watched him issue his 'threats', which are certainly bad but harmless theater so far. If they change in any meaningful way, I'll reconsider and act.
The other policy question is moderators censoring ideas. I know John doesn't like his theories criticized, and as moderator he could in theory use moderator authority to implement censorship. Rags at least did not do that. You could post most any position as long as you could defend it against other posters.
Is there an agreement among the current moderators not to censor ideas?
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.