Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bush Defends Media Against Trump!
#1
Smile 
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/ge...dia-235430 Big Grin

Also reveals Bush family voted for any one but Trump.
Reply
#2
(02-27-2017, 10:10 AM)Bad Dog Wrote: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/ge...dia-235430 Big Grin

Also reveals Bush family voted for any one but Trump.

Considering that Bush was willing to start a war based on fake news from The New York Times, no surprise!
Reply
#3
(02-27-2017, 10:38 AM)Warren Dew Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 10:10 AM)Bad Dog Wrote: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/ge...dia-235430 Big Grin

Also reveals Bush family voted for any one but Trump.

Considering that Bush was willing to start a war based on fake news from The New York Times, no surprise!

I'm wondering if we'll have an all out public contest for worst president ever?  Wink
Reply
#4
(02-27-2017, 12:23 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 10:38 AM)Warren Dew Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 10:10 AM)Bad Dog Wrote: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/ge...dia-235430 Big Grin

Also reveals Bush family voted for any one but Trump.

Considering that Bush was willing to start a war based on fake news from The New York Times, no surprise!

Was it based on so called NYT fake news or was it based on actual WMD, which were spirited across the border into Syria, and/or airlifted to Russia, just prior to the US invasion?

Definitely fake news.  Wink
Reply
#5
(02-27-2017, 12:31 PM)SomeGuy Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 12:23 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 10:38 AM)Warren Dew Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 10:10 AM)Bad Dog Wrote: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/ge...dia-235430 Big Grin

Also reveals Bush family voted for any one but Trump.

Considering that Bush was willing to start a war based on fake news from The New York Times, no surprise!

Was it based on so called NYT fake news or was it based on actual WMD, which were spirited across the border into Syria, and/or airlifted to Russia, just prior to the US invasion?

Definitely fake news.  Wink

I remember the head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, arguing that there were no nukes in Iraq at the time, and no evidence of a program either. Maybe he helped sneak them out. Tongue
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.
Reply
#6
And yet Charles Duelfer of the ISG looked into it and found limited evidence to support it.  We know he had chemical weapons at one point, we sold them to him, but there is no real evidence to support an active program after 1991, rather than simply the efforts to maintain the institutional knowledge.

Besides, this is just chemical weapons.  The justifications for war involved rather a bit more than that, didn't they?
Reply
#7
(02-27-2017, 06:21 PM)SomeGuy Wrote: And yet Charles Duelfer of the ISG looked into it and found limited evidence to support it.  We know he had chemical weapons at one point, we sold them to him, but there is no real evidence to support an active program after 1991, rather than simply the efforts to maintain the institutional knowledge.

Besides, this is just chemical weapons.  The justifications for war involved rather a bit more than that, didn't they?

There was no justification for that war.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive;
Eric M
Reply
#8
(02-27-2017, 11:08 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 06:21 PM)SomeGuy Wrote: And yet Charles Duelfer of the ISG looked into it and found limited evidence to support it.  We know he had chemical weapons at one point, we sold them to him, but there is no real evidence to support an active program after 1991, rather than simply the efforts to maintain the institutional knowledge.

Besides, this is just chemical weapons.  The justifications for war involved rather a bit more than that, didn't they?

There was no justification for that war.

Oh, "justifications" were made.  They just weren't very good ones.

In fact, if you were feeling particularly uncharitable, you could refer to them as out and out lies. Wink
Reply
#9
(02-27-2017, 11:41 PM)SomeGuy Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 11:08 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:
(02-27-2017, 06:21 PM)SomeGuy Wrote: And yet Charles Duelfer of the ISG looked into it and found limited evidence to support it.  We know he had chemical weapons at one point, we sold them to him, but there is no real evidence to support an active program after 1991, rather than simply the efforts to maintain the institutional knowledge.

Besides, this is just chemical weapons.  The justifications for war involved rather a bit more than that, didn't they?

There was no justification for that war.

Oh, "justifications" were made.  They just weren't very good ones.

In fact, if you were feeling particularly uncharitable, you could refer to them as out and out lies. Wink

The Problem with the iraq war was the flawed objective, the fact that it was a distraction from defeating Bin Laden. Finally the troops were forced by the government to fight with one arm behind their backs.

Example of how war would have looked like had the gloves been allowed to come off (and how xers and Millies wanted to fight):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xksZGHAvceA
Reply
#10
Did you ever get around to enlisting and joining that "military elite" you used to go on about?
Reply
#11
(02-28-2017, 12:26 AM)Cynic Hero Wrote: [quote pid='22114' dateline='1488254907']
There was no justification for that war.

Oh, "justifications" were made.  They just weren't very good ones.

In fact, if you were feeling particularly uncharitable, you could refer to them as out and out lies. Wink

The Problem with the iraq war was the flawed objective, the fact that it was a distraction from defeating Bin Laden. Finally the troops were forced by the government to fight with one arm behind their backs.

Example of how war would have looked like had the gloves been allowed to come off (and how xers and Millies wanted to fight):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xksZGHAvceA
[/quote]

You're kidding , right.  Karma's a bitch and disgusting actions like that in your vid shall lead to this:




---Value Added Cool
Reply
#12
Cynic Hero is a time transport from the Age of Mars.

[Image: marspic.jpg]

Red, -2300 to 300 CE: Mars is the planet of war, conquest and male dominance. Beginning with Sargon, this was the age of war conducted by powerful emperors. Warrior chiefs, inspired by war-gods, conquered and ruled cities and vast territories in a series of ever more-powerful empires until they were all brought under one universal empire (Rome, or China in the Orient). Although the emperors issued edicts, these were not states in the modern sense, in which peoples shared an identity, language and law and lived within fairly-stable boundaries. This Martian kind of "state" was really just the boundaries of the latest conquest. Martian assertive individualism expressed itself in the first democratic experiments in the early classic age (c.500-100 BC), and the quest for personal fame and glory. The wars redistributed the wealth and opened trade routes, breaking through the old hierarchies of the age of agriculture (Venus). Patriarchal gods replaced worship of the goddess everywhere, brought by warrior races who swooped in to conquer existing agricultural civilizations and settlements. Mars also represents iron and the skill to conquer nature by working with metals, as the stone age yielded to that of bronze and iron.





http://philosopherswheel.com/planetarydynamics.html
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive;
Eric M
Reply
#13
Rags:

Put up the videos from Castle Bravo... Smile

Then the photos of Bush looking out AF 1's window at a flooded New Orleans.

Insert Trump Mushroom Cloud Gif... Smile
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Yes, Hillary Clinton is still winning. And yes, the media is lying to you. naf140230 25 7,243 09-30-2016, 07:27 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)